Skip to main content

Similarities Between Co-evolution and Learning Classifier Systems and Their Applications

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3102))

Abstract

This article describes the similarities between learning classifier systems (LCSs) and coevolutionary algorithm, and exploits these similarities by taking ideas used by LCSs to design a non-generational coevolutionary algorithm that incrementally estimates fitness of individuals. The algorithm solves some of the problems known to exist in coevolutionary algorithms: it does not loose gradient and is successful in generating an arms race. It is tested on MAX 3-SAT problems, and compared to a generational coevolutionary algorithm and a simple genetic algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angeline, P.J., Pollack, J.B.: Competitive environments evolve better solutions for complex tasks. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 264–270 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheeseman, P., Kanefsky, B., Taylor, W.M.: Where the really hard problems are. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1991, Sidney, Australia, pp. 331–337 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cliff, D., Miller, G.F.: Tracking the red queen: Measurements of adaptive progress in co-evolutionary simulations. In: European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 200–218 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ficici, S.G., Pollack, J.B.: Challenges in coevolutionary learning: Arms-race dynamics, open-endedness, and mediocre stable states. In: Adami, C., Belew, R.K., Kitano, H., Taylor, C. (eds.) Artificial Life VI: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Life, Cambridge, MA, pp. 238–247. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel Hillis, W.: Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure. In: Langton, C.G., Taylor, C., Doyne Farmer, J., Rasmussen, S. (eds.) Artificial Life II, vol. X, pp. 313–324. Addison-Wesley, Santa Fe Institute (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holland, J.: Escaping brittleness: The possibilities of general-purpose learning algorithms applied to parallel rule-based systems. Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach 2 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoos, H.H., Stützle, T.: Satisfiability library. Version 1.4.4 (May 2001), http://www.satlib.org

  8. Pollack, J.B., Blair, A.D., Land, M.: Coevolution of a backgammon player. In: Langton, C.G. (ed.) Proceedings of Artificial Life V, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosin, C.D.: Coevolutionary search among adversaries. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosin, C.D., Belew, R.K.: Methods for competitive co-evolution: Finding opponents worth beating. In: Eshelman, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Francisco, CA, pp. 373–380. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Valenzuela-Rendón, M., Uresti-Charre, E.: A non generational genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 658–665. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Watson, R.A., Pollack, J.B.: Coevolutionary dynamics in a minimal substrate. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), San Francisco, California, USA, 7-11, pp. 702–709. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Palacios-Durazo, R.A., Valenzuela-Rendón, M. (2004). Similarities Between Co-evolution and Learning Classifier Systems and Their Applications. In: Deb, K. (eds) Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004. GECCO 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3102. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22344-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24854-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics