Skip to main content

FORM – A Sociologically Founded Framework for Designing Self-Organization of Multiagent Systems

  • Conference paper
Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems (RASTA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2934))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose FORM, a new Framework for self-Organization and Robustness in Multiagent systems. This framework supports the design of task-assignment multiagent systems in a way that is informed by sociological theory. It is founded on the habitus-field-theory of sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. In accordance to this theory, we consider the special quality of ”organization” as an autonomous and self-organizing social entity with clear distinction to the coordination via social interactions. Organizations are viewed as both ”autonomous social fields” and ”corporate agents”, which are competing with other organizations in the same domain. While our framework makes no claims about an underlying agent architecture, it consists of a matrix of mechanisms for delegation (task delegation and social delegation), which we consider a central concept to define organizational relationships. Using this matrix as a basic toolset, we propose a spectrum of seven types for the structure of multiagent systems, defined by qualitatively different relationships.

This research is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the Socionics framework under contracts Si 372/9-2 and Fl 336/1-2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bond, A.H., Gasser, L.: Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mason, C., Johnson, R., Searfus, R., Lager, D., Canales, T.: A seismic event analyzer for nuclear test ban treaty verification. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Hare, G.M.P., Jennings, N.R.: Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiß, G.: Adaptation and Learning in Multi-agent systems: Some remarks and a bibliography. In: Weiss, G., Sen, S. (eds.) IJCAI-WS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1042, Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jennings, N.: Agent-based computing: Promise and perils. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), pp. 1429–1436 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, K., Schillo, M., Siekmann, J.: Holonic multiagent systems: A foundation for the organization of multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Applications of Holonic and Multiagent Systems (HoloMAS 2003) (2003) (in print)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turner, P.J., Jennings, N.R.: Improving the scalability of multi-agent systems. In: Wagner, T.A., Rana, O.F. (eds.) AA-WS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1887, pp. 246–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. So, Y., Durfee, E.H.: Designing tree-structured organizations for computational agents. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 2, 219–246 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Axtell, R.: Effects of interaction topology and activation regime in several multi-agent systems. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 33–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishida, T., Gasser, L., Yokoo, M.: Organization self design of production systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 4(2), 123–134 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carley, K.M.: On the evolution of social and organizational networks. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16, 3–30 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Norman, T.J., O’Brien, P., Odgers, B.: Autonomous agents for business process management. Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 14, 145–189 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roth, G., Schwegler, H. (eds.): Self-organizing Systems. An Interdisciplinary Approach. Campus, Frankfurt (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer, K.: Holonic multiagent systems — theory and applications. In: Barahona, P., Alferes, J.J. (eds.) EPIA 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1695, pp. 34–48. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Koestler, A.: The Ghost in the Machine. Hutchinson & Co., London (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bourdieu, P.: Pascalian Meditations. Polity Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L.: An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Polity Press, Chicago (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schillo, M., Zinnikus, I., Fischer, K.: Towards a theory of flexible holons: Modelling institutions for making multi-agent systems robust. In: 2nd Workshop on Norms and Institutions in MAS, Montreal, Canada (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Argyris, C., Schön, D.A.: Die lernende Organisation. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Powell, W.W.: Neither market nor hierarchy network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 12, 295–336 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schillo, M., Fischer, K., Hillebrandt, F., Florian, M., Dederichs, A.: Bounded social rationality: Modelling self-organization and adaptation using habitus-field theory. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Modelling Artificial Societies and Hybrid Organizations (MASHO) at ECAI 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bourdieu, P.: Delegation and political fetishism. Thesis Eleven 10/11, 56–70 (1984/1985)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dederichs, A.M., Florian, M.: Felder, Organisationen und Akteure - eine organisationssoziologische Skizze. In: Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis. Erklärungskraft-Anwendung-Perspektiven, pp. 69–96. Opladen, Wiesbaden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schillo, M., Bürckert, H., Fischer, K., Klusch, M.: Towards a definition of robustness for market-style open multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA 2001), Montreal, Canada, pp. 75–76. ACM, NewYork (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Towards a theory of delegation for agent-based systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24, 141–157 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scott, W.R.: Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schillo, M.: Self-organization and adjustable autonomy: Two sides of the same medal? In: Hexmoor, H., Falcone, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the AAAI 2002 Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation, and Control: From Inter-agent to Groups (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schillo, M., Fischer, K., Knabe, T.: The contract-net with confirmation protocol: An improved mechanism for task assignment. Technical Report TM-01-01, DFKI (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schillo, M., Kray, C., Fischer, K.: The Eager Bidder Problem: A Fundamental Problem of DAI and Selected Solutions. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 599–607 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kemmner, G., Gillessen, A.: Virtuelle Unternehmen. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fischer, K., Müller, J.P., Heimig, I., Scheer, A.W.: Intelligent agents in virtual enterprises. In: Proc. of the First International Conference on Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM 1996), London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gulati, R., Garguilo, M.: Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104, 1439–1493 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jarillo, J.C.: On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 9, 31–41 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Freichel, S.L.K.: Organisation von Logistikservice-Netzwerken. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schillo, M., Fischer, K., Fley, B., Florian, M., Hillebrandt, F., Spresny, D. (2004). FORM – A Sociologically Founded Framework for Designing Self-Organization of Multiagent Systems. In: Lindemann, G., Moldt, D., Paolucci, M. (eds) Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems. RASTA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2934. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25867-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25867-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20923-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25867-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics