Skip to main content

A Teamwork Coordination Strategy Using Hierarchical Role Relationship Matching

  • Conference paper
  • 604 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2969))

Abstract

We present a teamwork coordination approach called the Rolegraph coordination strategy. It is used to dynamically coordinate agent teams that perform distributed collaborative tasks. Current agent coordination approaches recognise team activity by considering team member mental states using explicit communication, plan recognition, and observation. Such information is sometimes incomplete or unavailable. Our strategy recognises team activities by analysing role relationships in hierarchical teamwork structures. At runtime, graph representations of team structures, called Rolegraphs, are extracted, capturing collaborative team activity. Rolegraphs are approximately matched against predefined templates of known behaviour to infer agent mental states, such as intention, in order to recognise team activities. A case base is then referenced to retrieve suitable examples of coordinated team action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jack Teams User Guide. Agent Oriented Software Pty Ltd. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow, H.G., Burstall, R.M.: Subgraph Isomorphism, Matching Relational Structures and Maximal Cliques. Information Processing Letters 4(4), 83–84

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bratman, M.: Shared Cooperative Activity. In: Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency, pp. 93–108. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Teamwork. Nous, Special Issue on Cognitive Science and AI 25(4), 487–512

    Google Scholar 

  5. Durfee, E.H.: Practically Coordinating. AI Magazine 20(1), 99–116

    Google Scholar 

  6. Georgeff, M., Lansky, A.: Reactive Reasoning and Planning. In: Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1987), Seattle, WA, pp. 677–682 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action Artificial Intelligence, pp. 269–357. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guestrin, C., Koller, D., Parr, R.: Multiagent Planning with Factored MDPs. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 14

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinze, C., Goss, S., Pearce, A.: Plan Recognition in Military Simulation: Incorporating Machine Learning with Intelligent Agents. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999) Agent Workshop on Team Behaviour and Plan Recognition, Stockholm, pp. 53–64 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huber, M., Durfee, E.: On Acting Together: Without Communication. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 1996 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaminka, G.A., Tambe, M.: Robust Agent Teams Via Socially-Attentive Monitoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 12, 105–147

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kinny, D., Ljungberg, M., Rao, A., Sonenberg, E., Tidhar, G., Werner, E.: Planned Team Activity. In Artificial Social Systems. In: Castelfranchi, C., Werner, E. (eds.) MAAMAW 1992. LNCS, vol. 830, pp. 227–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kok, J., Spaan, M., Vlassis, N.: An Approach to Noncommunicative Multiagent Coordination in Continuous Domains. In: Proceedings of Benelearn 2002 Annual Machine Learning Conference of Belgium and The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kolodner, J.: Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn, H.W.: The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart 2, 83–97

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lesser, V.: Reflections on the Nature of Multi-Agent Coordination and Its Implications for an Agent Architecture. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1, 89–111

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mathieu, P., Routier, J.C., Secq, Y.: Dynamic Organization of Multi-Agent Systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on: Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy, July 15-19, pp. 451–452 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nyanchama, M., Osborn, S.: The Role Graph Model and Conflict of Interest. ACM Transactions on Information and Systems Security 2(1), 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Modeling Rational Agents within a Bdi-Architecture. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simao Sichman, J., Conte, R.: Multi-Agent Dependence by Dependence Graphs. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on: Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2002, Bologna, Italy, July 15-19, pp. 483–490 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sonenberg, E., Tidhar, G.: Observations on Team-Oriented Mental State Recognition. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999) Agent Workshop on Team Behaviour and Plan Recognition, Stockholm (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soon, S., Pearce, A., Noble, M.: Modelling the Collaborative Mission Planning Process Using Dynamic Teamwork Structures. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on: Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Melbourne, Australia, July 14-18, pp. 1124–1125. Association for Computing Machinery (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tambe, M.: Towards Flexible Teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7, 83–124

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tidhar, G., Rao, A.S., Sonenberg, E.A.: Guided Team Selection. In: ICMAS 1996 Proceedings. Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 369–376. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Cooperative Problem-Solving Process. Journal of Logic and Computation 9(4), 563–592

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Soon, S., Pearce, A., Noble, M. (2004). A Teamwork Coordination Strategy Using Hierarchical Role Relationship Matching. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds) Agents and Computational Autonomy. AUTONOMY 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22477-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25928-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics