Skip to main content

Classifiers Based on Two-Layered Learning

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3066))

Abstract

In this paper we present an exemplary classifier (classification algorithm) based on two-layered learning. In the first layer of learning a collection of classifiers is induced from a part of original training data set. In the second layer classifiers are induced using patterns extracted from already constructed classifiers on the basis of their performance on the remaining part of training data. We report results of experiments performed on the following data sets, well known from literature: diabetes, heart disease, australian credit (see [5]) and lymphography (see [4]). We compare the standard rough set method used to induce classifiers (see [1] for more details), based on minimal consistent decision rules (see [6]), with the classifier based on two-layered learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazan, J.: A comparison of dynamic non-dynamic rough set methods for extracting laws from decision tables. In: [7], pp. 321–365

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazan, J., Nguyen, H.S., Skowron, A., Szczuka, M.: A view on rough set concept approximation. In: Wang, G., Liu, Q., Yao, Y., Skowron, A. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2639, pp. 181–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, J.H., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Grzymała-Busse, J.: A New Version of the Rule Induction System LERS. Fundamenta Informaticae 31(1), 27–39 (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Taylor, C.C.: Machine learning, neural and statistical classification. Ellis Horwood, New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.): Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery, vol. 1-2. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. The RSES Homepage – logic.mimuw.edu.pl/~rses

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bazan, J.G. (2004). Classifiers Based on Two-Layered Learning. In: Tsumoto, S., Słowiński, R., Komorowski, J., Grzymała-Busse, J.W. (eds) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. RSCTC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3066. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22117-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25929-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics