Skip to main content

Interpreting Lines in Graphs: Do Graph Users Construe Fictive Motion?

  • Conference paper
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2980))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

A pilot study was designed to investigate the plausibility of construing fictive motion from function lines in Cartesian graphs.Participants (n=18) were presented with a series of lines graphs and required to judge which of two lines of expressed the greatest rate of change in the value of Y.Some of the graphs had arrows pointing in a direction of the line that was either consistent (consistent condition) or inconsistent (inconsistent condition) with change progressing from the origin of the horizontal axis.Graphs in the neutral condition had no arrows.It was hypothesized that if users construe fictive motion when interpreting change of function lines then (a) inconsistent arrows should detrimentally interfere with the judgments and (b) consistent arrows should facilitate the judgments.Results were as predicted.Response times in inconsistent trials were slower than the neutral condition and for consistent trials response times were faster than the neutral condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barsalou, L.W.: Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavoural and Brain Sciences 22, 577–609 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gattis, M., Holyoak, K.J.: Mapping Conceptual to Spatial Relations in Visual Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22, 231–239 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lakoff, G., Nunez, R.E.: Where Mathematics comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Philosophy in the Flesh. Basic Books, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talmy, L.: Fictive Motion in Language and “Ception”. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L., Garret, M. (eds.) Language and Space, MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barone, R., Cheng, P.C.H. (2004). Interpreting Lines in Graphs: Do Graph Users Construe Fictive Motion?. In: Blackwell, A.F., Marriott, K., Shimojima, A. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2980. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25931-2_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25931-2_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21268-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25931-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics