Skip to main content

A Social Approach to Communication in Multiagent Systems

  • Conference paper
Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2990))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper aims at defining the semantics of Agent Communication Languages (ACLs) in terms of changes in the social relationships between agents, represented in terms of social commitments. We take commitment to be a primitive concept underlying the social dimension of multiagent systems, and define a basic artificial institution that provides agents with the means to affect the commitment network that binds them to each other. Two different approaches are adopted for the presentation of our proposal: a logical formalization and an operational specification.

Partially supported by Swiss National Science Foundation project 200021-100260, “An Open Interaction Framework for Communicative Agents”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In: Cohen, P., Morgan, J., Pollack, M. (eds.) Intentions in communication, pp. 221–256. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Finin, T., Labrou, Y., Mayfield, J.: KQML as an agent communication language. In: Bradshaw, J. (ed.) Software agents, The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents: FIPA 1997 Specification Part 2: Agent Communication Language (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, M.P.: Agent communication languages: Rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer 31, 40–47 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, M.P.: A social semantics for agent communication languages. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Agent Communication Languages, pp. 75–88 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colombetti, M.: A commitment–based approach to agent speech acts and conversations. In: Proc. Workshop on Agent Languages and Communication Policies, 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 2000), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 21–29 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pitt, J., Mamdani, A.: A protocol-based semantics for an agent communication language. In: Thomas, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), vol. 1, pp. 486–491. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, A., Parent, X.: Conventional signalling acts and conversation. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (to be published)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: A logical model of social commitment for agent communication. In: Rosenschein, J.S., Sandholm, T., Wooldridge, M., Yokoo, M. (eds.) Proc. Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 528–535. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: Operational specification of a commitment-based agent communication language. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Proc. First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, pp. 535–542. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: Defining interaction protocols using a commitmentbased agent communication language. In: Rosenschein, J.S., Sandholm, T., Wooldridge, M., Yokoo, M. (eds.) Proc. Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 520–527. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombetti, M., Verdicchio, M.: An analysis of agent speech acts as institutional actions. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Proc. First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, pp. 1157–1166. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alberti, M., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: Modeling Interactions Using Social Integrity Constraints: A Resource Sharing Case Study. In: Leite, J., Omicini, A., Sterling, L., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2990, pp. 243–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Searle, J.R.: The construction of social reality. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones, A., Sergot, M.J.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Journal of the IGPL 4, 429–445 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: ‘Sometimes’ and ‘Not Never’ Revisited. Journal of the ACM 33, 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Esteva, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C., Garcia, P., Arcos, J.L.: On the formal specification of electronic institutions. In: Sierra, C., Dignum, F.P.M. (eds.) AgentLink 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1991, pp. 126–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Vasconcelos, W.W.: Logic-based electronic institutions. In: Leite, J., Omicini, A., Sterling, L., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2990, pp. 221–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Reichenbach, H.: Elements of Symbolic Logic. MacMillan, New York (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Searle, J.R., Vanderveken, D.: Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents: FIPA Content Language (CL) Specifications (2003), http://www.fipa.org

  23. Ferguson, G., Allen, J., Fikes, R., Hayes, P., McDermott, D., Niles, I., Pease, A., Tate, A., Tyson, M., Waldinger, R.: A DAML ontology of time (2002), http://www.cs.rochester.edu/~ferguson/daml/

  24. Harnad, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Colombetti, M., Fornara, N., Verdicchio, M. (2004). A Social Approach to Communication in Multiagent Systems. In: Leite, J., Omicini, A., Sterling, L., Torroni, P. (eds) Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies. DALT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25932-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25932-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22124-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25932-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics