Skip to main content

Robust Aggregation of Expert Opinions Based on Conflict Analysis and Resolution

  • Conference paper
Current Topics in Artificial Intelligence (TTIA 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3040))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a new technique for combining the opinions given by a team of independent experts. Each opinion is associated with a confidence level that represents the expert’s conviction on its own judgement. The proposed technique first measures the conflict level introduced by every expert by taking into account the similarity between both its opinion and confidence, and those of the other experts within the team. An expert who disagrees with the majority of other experts with a similar confidence level is assumed to be conflicting (an “outlier” expert). Based on those conflict levels, an arbitration mechanism determines the reliability associated with each expert, by considering that a reliable expert is the one which is both confident and non-conflicting. Finally, the aggregated opinion is obtained as a weighted average (linear opinion pool) of the original expert opinions, with the weights being the reliability levels determined before. The proposed technique has been applied to texture image classification, leading to significantly better results than commonly-used opinion integration approaches.

This work has been partially supported by the Government of Spain under the CICYT project DPI2001-2094-C03-02.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akter, T., Simonovic, S.S.: A General Overview of Multiple-objective Multiple-participant Decision Making for Flood Management. Research report, Facility for Intelligent Decision Support. University of Western Ontario, Canada (2002), http://www.engga.uwo.ca/research/iclr/fids/Documents/MOMP_Report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, J.: Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Clemen, R.T., Winkler, R.L.: Combining Probability Distributions from Experts in Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis 19(2), 187–203 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. French, S.: Group Consensus Probability Distributions: A Critical Survey. In: Bernardo, J.M., DeGroot, M.H., Lindley, D.V., Smith, A.F.M. (eds.) Bayesian Statistics 2, pp. 183–202. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kittler, J.: Feature Selection and Extraction. In: Young, T.Y., Fu, K.S. (eds.) Handbook of Pattern Recog. and Image Proc., pp. 60–81. Academic Press, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Puig, D., García, M.A.: Recognizing Specific Texture Patterns by Integration of Multiple Texture Methods. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Rochester, USA, vol. 1, pp. 125–128 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Randen, T., Husoy, J.H.: Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study. IEEE Trans. PAMI 21(4), 291–310 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, G., Burns, I.: Measuring Texture Classification Algorithms. Pattern Recognition Letters 18, 1495–1501 (1997); MeasTex Image Texture Database and Test Suite. Centre for Sensor Signal and Information Processing, University of Queensland, Australia, http://www.cssip.uq.edu.au/staff/meastex/meastex.html

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Srisoepardani, K.P.: Evaluation of Group Decision Making Methods (Ch. 6). In: The Possibility Theorem for Group Decision Making, Ph. D. dissertation, Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K.: Pattern Recognition. Academic Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tubbs, J.D., Alltop, W.O.: Measures of Confidence Associated with Combining Classification Results. IEEE Trans. SMC 21(3), 690–693 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yager, R.R.: On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Trans. SMC 18(1), 183–190 (1988)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yager, R.R.: Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 59, 125–148 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garcia, M.A., Puig, D. (2004). Robust Aggregation of Expert Opinions Based on Conflict Analysis and Resolution. In: Conejo, R., Urretavizcaya, M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, JL. (eds) Current Topics in Artificial Intelligence. TTIA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3040. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25945-9_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25945-9_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22218-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25945-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics