Skip to main content

An Empirical Analysis of Assessment Errors for Weights and Andness in LSP Criteria

  • Conference paper
Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3131))

Abstract

We investigate the accuracy of parameters in the Logic Scoring of Preference (LSP) criterion functions for system evaluation. Main parameters are weights and conjunction/disjunction degrees (andness/orness). Weights reflect the level of relative importance of various decision variables. Andness/orness describes a desired level of simultaneity/replaceability in satisfying component criteria. These parameters are assessed by one or more professional evaluators and their values differ from (usually unknown) optimum values. In this paper we identify all potential sources of errors in LSP criterion functions. Our goal is to investigate the distribution of errors, their average values, and the quality of individual evaluators and their teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barron, F.H., Barrett, B.E.: The efficacy of SMART – Simple Multi- Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking. Acta Psychologica 93, 23–36 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Belton, V., Stewart, T.J.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: an Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bottomley, P.A., Doyle, J.R.: A Comparison of Three Weight Elicitation Methods: Good, Better, and Best. Omega 29, 553–560 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler, J., Jia, J., Dyer, J.: Simulation Techniques for the Sensitivity Analysis of Multi- Criteria Decision Models. European Journal of Operational Research 103, 531–546 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dujmović, J.J.: Correlational Aspects of Error Compensation in the Weighted Scoring Method for Selection of Data Processing Systems (In Serbo-Croatian). In: Proceedings of the 7th Informatica Conference (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dujmović, J.J.: A Generalization of Some Functions in Continuous Mathematical Logic (In Serbo-Croatian) .In: Proceedings of the Informatica Conference, Bled, Yugoslavia (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dujmović, J.J.: Mixed Averaging by Levels (MAL)–A System and Computer Evaluation Method (In Serbo-Croatian) .In: Proceedings of the Informatica Conference, Bled, Yugoslavia (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dujmović, J.: Weighted Conjunctive and Disjunctive Means and their Application in System Evaluation. Journal of the University of Belgrade, EE Dept., Series Mathematics and Physics 483, 147–158 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dujmović, J.J.: Extended Continuous Logic and the Theory of Complex Criteria. Journal of the University of Belgrade, EE Dept., Series Mathematics and Physics 537, 197–216 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dujmović, J.J.: Partial Absorption Function. Journal of the University of Belgrade, EE Dept., Series Mathematics and Physics 659, 156–163 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dujmović, J.J., Elnicki, R.: A DMS Cost/Benefit Decision Model: Mathematical Models for Data Management System Evaluation, Comparison, and Selection. National Bureau of Standards, Washington D.C., No. GCR 82-374. NTIS No. PB 82-170150, p.150 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dujmović, J.J.: Preferential Neural. In: Antognetti, P., Milutinović, V. (eds.) Neural Networks - Concepts, Applications, and Implementations. Prentice-Hall Advanced Reference Series, vol. . II,ch.7, pp. 155–206. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Filev, D.P., Yager, R.R.: On the Issue of Obtaining OWA Operator Weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 94, 157–169 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilb, T.: Software Metrics. Winthrop Publishers (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jessop, A.: Sensitivity and Robustness in Selection Problems. Computers & Operations Research 31, 607–622 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, R.A., Morrison, S.A.: A Software Quality Assessment Methodology for Evaluating System Lifecycle Risks. MITRE Corporation (January 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, G.A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. The Psychological Review 63, 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts, R., Goodwin, P.: Weight Approximations in Multi-attribute Decision Models. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 11, 291–303 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rouder, J.N., Morey, R.D., Cowan, N., Pfalz, M.: Learning in Unidimensional Absolute Identification (2004), http://www.missouri.edu/p~cl/papers/learnline.pdf

  20. Scharf(Gilb), T.: Weighted Ranking by Levels. IAG Journal 2(2), 7–18 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scharf (Gilb), T.: Weighted Ranking by Levels Computer Evaluation Method – One Year of Experience. IAG Journal 3(3), 71–91 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stewart, T.J.: Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5, 301–309 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Su, S.Y.W., Dujmovič, J.J., Batory, D.S., Navathe, S.B., Elnicki, R.: A Cost-Benefit Decision Model: Analysis, Comparison, and Selection of Data Management Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 12(3), 472–520 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Torra, V.: Learning Weights for the Quasi-Weighted Mean. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 10(5), 653–666 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dujmović, J.J., Fang, W.Y. (2004). An Empirical Analysis of Assessment Errors for Weights and Andness in LSP Criteria. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3131. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27774-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27774-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22555-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27774-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics