Skip to main content

On the (Re-)Use of IP-Components in Re-configurable Platforms

  • Conference paper
Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation (SAMOS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3133))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When mapping high-throughput signal processing applications onto heterogeneous platforms, parts of these applications will most likely be mapped into re-configurable components. The current trend of automating such mappings assumes that one can transform application specification to implementation specification without delving deep into details. This implies that one has to rely on the (re-)use of IP components, even when it remains unknown what the final exact specification of the implementation components will be. When it comes to 1) (re-)using of IP components, 2) porting of designs from one platform (component) to another, and 3) relying on IP components in high-level (task-level) application to (re-configurable) platform (component) mapping, the design requirements and constraints are not well defined. To find out what they should be, we have conducted two case studies around the (re-)use of IP components; one focusing on the porting issue, and one dealing with the automated task-level mapping. The goal of these case studies was to identify and resolve the problems that come with the so-called completion logic or glue logic that hinders fast and accurate IP embedding in a high-level implementation specification and description.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crochiere, R., Rabiner, L.: Fundamental of Multirate Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keating, M., Bricaud, P.: Reuse Methodology Manual, 3rd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Voros, N.S.: System Design Reuse,  ch.7, pp. 79–99. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Alliot, S.: Architecture Exploration for Large Scale Array Signal Processing Systems. PhD thesis, Leiden University, The Netherlands (December 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.: Defining platform- based design. EEDesign of EETimes (February 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, T., et al.: Compilation from Matlab to Process Networks Realized in FPGA . Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht ( April 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.altera.com

  8. http://www.xilinx.com

  9. Open Core Protocol International Partnership, http://www.ocpip.org/about/ocp

  10. http://www.mentor.com/fpga

  11. http://www.synopsys.com

  12. Givaris, T., Vahid, F., Henkel, J.: System-Level Exploration for Pareto-optimal Configurations in Parameterized SoC.In: Proc. IEEE/ACM ICCCAD (November 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. VSI, Virtual Socket Interface Alliance, http://www.vsi.org

  14. OMG: Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org

  15. CSYDIC-Telecom, System Design Industrial Council of European Telecom Industries, http://sydic.vitamib.com

  16. Doucet, F., Gupta, R.: Microelectronic SoC Modeling using Objects and their Relationships. In:1st Online Symposium for Electrical Engineers (May 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kienhuis, B., Rypkema, E., Deprettere, E.: Compaan: Deriving Process Networks form Matlab for Embedded Signal Processing Architectures. In: Proc. Of the 8th International workshop on the Hardware/Software Codesign (CODES) (May 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zissulescu, C., Stefanov, T., Kienhuis, B., Deprettere, E.: LAURA:Leiden Architecture Research and Exploration Tool. In: Y. K. Cheung, P., Constantinides, G.A. (eds.) FPL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2778, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lemaitre, J., Alliot, S., Deprettere, E. (2004). On the (Re-)Use of IP-Components in Re-configurable Platforms. In: Pimentel, A.D., Vassiliadis, S. (eds) Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation. SAMOS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3133. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27776-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27776-7_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22377-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27776-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics