Skip to main content

Possible Equivalence Relations and Their Application to Hypothesis Generation in Non-deterministic Information Systems

  • Conference paper
Transactions on Rough Sets II

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TRS,volume 3135))

Abstract

Non–deterministic Information Systems (NISs) are ad-vanced extensions of Deterministic Information Systems (DISs), and NISs are known well as systems handling information incompleteness in tables. This paper examines manipulations on equivalence relations in DISs and manipulations on possible equivalence relations in NISs. This paper also follows rough sets based rule generation in DISs, and proposes rough sets based hypothesis generation in NISs. A hypothesis in NISs is defined by a formula satisfying some kinds of constraint, and effective algorithms for generating hypotheses in NISs are presented. Possible equivalence relations play important roles in generating hypotheses. Some illustrative examples and real executions of algorithms are shown, too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlak, Z.: New look on Bayes’ Theorem - the rough set outlook. Bulletin of Int. Rough Set Society 5, 1–8 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Komorowski, J., Pawlak, Z., Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough Sets: A tutorial. In: Pal, S.K., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Fuzzy Hybridization, pp. 3–98. Springer, Singapore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nakamura, A., Tsumoto, S., Tanaka, H., Kobayashi, S.: Rough set theory and its applications. Journal of Japanese Society for AI 11, 209–215 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.): Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 1. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 18, Physica (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.): Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 2. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 19, Physica (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grzymala–Busse, J.: A new version of the rule induction system LERS. Fundamenta Informaticae 31, 27–39 (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ziarko, W.: Variable precision rough set model. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 46, 39–59 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsumoto, S.: Knowledge discovery in clinical databases and evaluation of discovered knowledge in outpatient clinic. Information Sciences 124, 125–137 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhong, N., Dong, J., Fujitsu, S., Ohsuga, S.: Soft techniques to rule discovery in data. Transactions of Information Processing Society of Japan 39, 2581–2592 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rough Set Software. Bulletin of Int. Rough Set Society 2, 15–46 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Codd, E.: A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM 13, 377–387 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Grzymala–Busse, J.: On the unknown attribute values in learning from examples. In: Raś, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds.) ISMIS 1991. LNCS, vol. 542, pp. 368–377. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Orlowska, E., Pawlak, Z.: Representation of nondeterministic information. Theoretical Computer Science 29, 27–39 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Orlowska, E.: What you always wanted to know about rough sets. In: Orlowska, E. (ed.) Incomplete Information: Rough Set Analysis, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 13, Physica, pp. 1–20 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lipski, W.: On semantic issues connected with incomplete information Databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 4, 262–296 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lipski, W.: On databases with incomplete information. Journal of the ACM 28, 41–70 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura, A.: A rough logic based on incomplete information and its application. Int. Journal of Approximate Reasoning 15, 367–378 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kryszkiewicz, M.: Rough set approach to incomplete information systems. Information Sciences 112, 39–49 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kryszkiewicz, M.: Rules in incomplete information systems. Information Sciences 113, 271–292 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakai, H.: Another fuzzy prolog. In: Proceedings of the 4th Int. Workshop on Rough Set, Fuzzy Set and Machine Discovery, Tokyo, pp. 261–268 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sakai, H.: Some issues on nondeterministic knowledge bases with incomplete and selective information. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) RSCTC 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1424, pp. 424–431. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakai, H., Okuma, A.: An algorithm for finding equivalence relations from tables with non–deterministic information. In: Zhong, N., Skowron, A., Ohsuga, S. (eds.) RSFDGrC 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1711, pp. 64–72. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakai, H., Okuma, A.: An algorithm for checking dependencies of attributes in a table with non–deterministic information: A rough sets based approach. In: Mizoguchi, R., Slaney, J.K. (eds.) PRICAI 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1886, pp. 219–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakai, H.: Two procedures for dependencies among attributes in a table with nondeterministic information: a summary. In: Terano, T., Nishida, T., Namatame, A., Tsumoto, S., Ohsawa, Y., Washio, T. (eds.) JSAI-WS 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2253, pp. 301–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakai, H.: Effective procedures for handling possible equivalence relations in non– deterministic information systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 48, 343–362 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Grzymala–Busse, J., Werbrouck, P.: On the best search method in the LEM1 and LEM2 algorithms. In: Orlowska, E. (ed.) Incomplete Information: Rough Set Analysis. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 13, pp. 75–91. Physica, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sakai, H. (2004). Possible Equivalence Relations and Their Application to Hypothesis Generation in Non-deterministic Information Systems. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Dubois, D., Grzymała-Busse, J.W., Inuiguchi, M., Polkowski, L. (eds) Transactions on Rough Sets II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3135. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27778-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27778-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23990-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27778-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics