Skip to main content

Linear Temporal Logic and Z Refinement

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3116))

Abstract

Since Z, being a state-based language, describes a system in terms of its state and potential state changes, it is natural to want to describe properties of a specified system also in terms of its state. One means of doing this is to use Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) in which properties about the state of a system over time can be captured. This, however, raises the question of whether these properties are preserved under refinement. Refinement is observation preserving and the state of a specified system is regarded as internal and, hence, non-observable.

In this paper, we investigate this issue by addressing the following questions. Given that a Z specification A is refined by a Z specification C, and that P is a temporal logic property which holds for A, what temporal logic property Q can we deduce holds for C? Furthermore, under what circumstances does the property Q preserve the intended meaning of the property P? The paper answers these questions for LTL, but the approach could also be applied to other temporal logics over states such as CTL and the μ-calculus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrial, J.R.: The B Book: Assigning Programs to Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolton, C., Davies, J.: A Singleton Failures Semantics for Communicating Sequential Processes. Formal Aspects of Computing (2002) (under consideration)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Long, D.: Model checking and abstraction. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 16(5), 1512–1542 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darlot, C., Julliand, J., Kouchnarenko, O.: Refinement preserves PLTL properties. In: Bert, D., Bowen, J.P., King, S., Waldén, M. (eds.) ZB 2003. LNCS, vol. 2651, pp. 408–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Derrick, J., Boiten, E.: Refinement in Z and Object-Z, Foundations and Advanced Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Derrick, J., Boiten, E.A.: Relational concurrent refinement. Formal Aspects of Computing 15(1), 182–214 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Emerson, E.A.: Temporal and modal logic. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 996–1072. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, C.B.: Systematic Software Development using VDM. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozen, D.: Results on the propositional μ-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science 27, 333–354 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Loiseaux, C., Graf, S., Sifakis, J., Bouajjani, A., Bensalem, S.: Property preserving abstractions for the verification of concurrent systems. Formal Methods in System Design 6(1) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, G.: The Object-Z Specification Language. In: Smith, G. (ed.) Advances in Formal Methods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, G., Winter, K.: Proving temporal properties of z specifications using abstraction. In: Bert, D., Bowen, J.P., King, S., Waldén, M. (eds.) ZB 2003. LNCS, vol. 2651, pp. 408–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Spivey, J.M.: The Z Notation: A Reference Manual, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Derrick, J., Smith, G. (2004). Linear Temporal Logic and Z Refinement. In: Rattray, C., Maharaj, S., Shankland, C. (eds) Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology. AMAST 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27815-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27815-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22381-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27815-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics