Skip to main content

Mutual Adaptation in a Prosthetics Application

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3139))

Abstract

Prosthetic care for handicapped persons requires new and reliable robotics technology. In this paper, developmental approaches for prosthetic applications are described. In addition, the challenges associated with the adaptation and control of materials for human hand prosthetics are presented. The new technology of robotics for prosthetics provides many possibilities for the detection of human intention. This is particularly true with the use of electromyogram (EMG) and mechanical actuation with multiple degrees of freedom. The EMG signal is a nonlinear wave, and has time dependency and big individual differences. The EMG signal is a nonlinear wave that has time dependency and significant differences from one individual to another. A method for how an individual adapts to the processing of EMG signals is being studied to determine and classify a human’s intention to move. A prosthetic hand with 11 degrees of freedom (DOF) was developed for this study. In order to make it light-weight, an adaptive joint mechanism was applied. The application results demonstrate the challenges for human adaptation. The f-MRI data show a process of replacement from a phantom limb image to a prosthetic hand image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Uchida, M., Ide, H., Ninomiya, S.P.: Control of a robot arm by myoelectric potential. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 5(3), 259–265 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farry, K.A., Walker, I.D., Baraniuk, R.G.: Myoelectric teleoperation of a complex robotic hand. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 12(5), 775–788 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hudgins, B., Parker, P., Scott, R.N.: New strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering 40(1), 82–94 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sears, H.H., Shaperman, J.: Electric wrist rotation in proportional-controlled systems. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 10(4), 92–98

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dechev, N., Cleghorn, W.L., Naumann, S.: Multiple finger, passive adaptive grasp prosthetic hand. Mechanism and Machine Theory 36, 1157–1173 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Neal, M.: Coming to grips with artificial hand design. Design Engineering, 26–27,29,32,34 (March 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. SensorHand technical information booklet : Otto Bock Co., Ltd (2001), http://www.healthcare.ottobock.com/

  8. Ishikawa, Y., Yu, W., Yokoi, H., Kakazu, Y.: Development of robot hands with an adjustable power transmitting mechanism. Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Neural Networks 10, 631–636 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirose, S., Ma, S.: Coupled tendon-driven multijoint manipulator. In: Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, pp. 1268–1275 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Nishikawa, et al., “On-line learning based electromyogram to forearm motion classifier with motor skill evaluation,” JSME Intl. Journal Series C, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 906–915, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katoh, R., et al.: Evaluation of biosignal processing method for welfare assisting devices - Evaluation of EMG information extraction processing using entropy -. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 14(6), 573–580 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crinier, S.: Behavior-Based Control of a Robot Hand using Tactile Sensors.” Master’s thesis written at the Center for Autonomous Systems, Royal Inst. Tech. In: Sweden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buttazzo, G., et al.: Robot Tactile Perception. In: Lee, C.S.G. (ed.) Sensor Based Robots: Algorithms and Architectures, Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bicchi, A.:Optimal Control of Robotic Grasping. In: Proc. American Control Conf. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buttazzo, G., et al.: Robot Tactile Perception. In: Lee, C.S.G. (ed.) Sensor Based Robots: Algorithms and Architectures, Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kyberd, P.J., Chappell, P.H.: The Southampton hand: An intelligent myoelectric prosthesis. J. Rehabilitation Research and Development 31(4), 326–334 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17. Conductive rubber silicon sheet. Characteristic Performance CS57-7RSC(CSA)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Plettenburg, D.H.: Prosthetic control: A case for extended physiological proprioception. Univ. New Brunswick, MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rios Poveda, A.: Myoelectric prosthesis with sensorial feedback. University of New Brunswick, MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Handa, Y., et al.: Sensory feedback on the FES. J. Biomechanism 12(1) (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshida, M., Sasaki, Y., Nakayama, N.: Sensory feedback for biomimetic prosthetic hand. In: BPES, The 17th living body and physiology engineering symposium (2002) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Flor, H., et al.: Taub.Phantom-Limb Pain As A Perceptual Correlate Of Cortical Reorganization Following Arm Amputation. Nature 375, 482–484 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MacLachlan, M., et al.: Psychological correlates of illusory body experiences. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 40(1), 59–66 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Mano, Y., et al.: Central motor reorganization after anastomosis of the musculocutaneous and intercostal nerves following cervical root avulsion. Ann. Neurol. 38, 15–20 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naruse, K., et al.: Development of EMG-based force sensing system in virtual reality system. In: Proc. of The Ninth Intl. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, pp. 185-190 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yokoi, H., Arieta, A.H., Katoh, R., Yu, W., Watanabe, I., Maruishi, M. (2004). Mutual Adaptation in a Prosthetics Application. In: Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L., Kuniyoshi, Y. (eds) Embodied Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3139. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27833-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27833-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22484-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27833-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics