Skip to main content

Guidelines towards Effectively Sharable LOs

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3143))

Abstract

LOs ask teachers to present didactical material in an objective form so to make them easily re- usable by their colleagues. This is a complex task which entails the development of a methodological approach apt to support producer-teachers’ work. For this sake, we present guidelines for the design of didactical modules. This proposal aims to help teachers 1) to reflect on how to make explicit their own pedagogical intentions; 2) to detect methods apt to help write sharable LOs, without adding constraints on the choice of the pedagogical approach. This can constitute a starting point to enrich LOs’ metadata with more effective pedagogical information, so to meet teachers’ needs and use a language familiar to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anido, L.E., Fernandez, M.J., Caeiro, M., Santos, J.M., Rodriguez, J.S., Llamas, M.: Educational metadata and brokerage for learning resources. Computers & Education 38, 351–374 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boskic, N.: Learning objects design: What do educators think about the quality and reusability of learning objects? In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 306–307 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bratina, T.A., Hayes, D., Blumsack, S.L.: Preparing Teachers to use Learning Objects. Faculty and staff development (November/December 2002), http://ts.mivu.org

  4. Busetti, E., Forcheri, P., Ierardi, M.G., Molfino, M.T.: Repositories of Learning Objects as Learning Environments for Teachers. In: Proceedings of ICALT 2004 (2004) (in print)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chitwood, K., Bunnow, D.: Learning Objects: Resources for Learning. In: Proceedings of Distance learning 2002, 18th Annual conference on distance teaching and learning, Madison, Wisconsin, August 14-16, pp. 67–70 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duval, E., Forte, E., Cardinaels, K., Verhoeven, B., Van Durm, R., Hendrikx, K., Wentland Forte, M., Ebel, N., Macowicz, M., Warkentyne, K., Haenni, F.: The Ariadne knowledge pool system. ACM Communications 44(5), 72–78 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farance, F.: IEEE LOM Standard Not Yet Ready For ”Prime Time”. Learning Technology 5(1) (2003), http://lttf.ieee.org/learn_tech/issues/january2003/index.html

  8. Feldstein, M.: Tutorial: How to design recyclable learning objects. eLearn 2002(7) (2002), http://portal.acm.org/portal.cfm

  9. Friesen, N.: Three Objections to Learning Objects. In: McGreal, R. (ed.) Education Using Learning Objects, Routledge/Falmer, London (2004), (to appear), see preliminary version on http://phenom.educ.ualberta.ca/~nfriesen/

  10. Friesen, N., Mason, J., Ward, N.: Building Educational Metadata Application Profiles. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata for e-Communities, pp. 63–69 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koppi, T., Lavitt, N.: Institutional Use of Learning Objects Three Years on: Lessons Learned and Future Directions. In: Learning Objects 2003 Symposium: Lessons Learned, Questions Asked 24 June 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii (2003), http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~erikd/PRES/2003/LO2003/index.html

  12. IEEE Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata (2002), http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf

  13. Ip, A., Morrison, I., Currie, M.: What is a learning object, technically? In: Proceedings of WebNet 2001 Conference (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ip, A., Young, A., Morrison, I.: Learning Objects: Whose are they? In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, pp. 315–320 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Littlejohn, A.: An incremental approach to staff development in the reuse of learning resources. In: Littlejohn, A. (ed.) Reusing on line resources: a sustainable approach to elearning, pp. 221–233. Kogan Page, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mason, J., Ward, N.: The Le@rning Federation Metadata Application Profile. Learning Technology 5 (1) (2003), http://lttf.ieee.org/learn_tech/issues/january2003/index.html

  17. Neven, F., Duval, E.: Reusable Learning Objects: a Survey of LOM-Based Repositories. In: Multimedia 2002, pp. 291–294 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noss, R.: Thematic Chapter: Computers as Commodities. In: di Sessa, A.A., Hoyles, C., Noss, R. (eds.) Computers and exploratory learning, pp. 363–381. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Polsani, P.R.: Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. Journal of Digital information 3(4) (2003), http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk

  20. Quinn, C., Hobbs, S.: Learning Objects and Instruction Components: Formal discussion summary. Educational Technology & Society 3(2) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rawlings, A., van Rosmalen, P., Koper, R., Rodríguez-Artacho, M., Lefrere, P.: Survey of Educational Modelling Languages (EMLs). In: CEN/ISSS WS Learning Technologies Workshop (2002), http://sensei.lsi.uned.es/palo/eml-version1.pdf

  22. Redeker, G.: Learning Objects-Instructional Metadata and Sequencing. In: Proceedings of e-Learn 2002, pp. 798–805 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Richards, G.: The Challenges of the Learning Object Paradigm. Special issue on Learning Objects, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 28(3) (2002), http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol28.3/

  24. Suthers, D., Johnson, S., Tillinghast, B.: Learning Object Meta-data for a Database of Primary and Secondary School Resources. Interactive Learning Environments 9(3), 273–289 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiley, D.A.: Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In: Wiley, D.A. (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (2000), http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Busetti, E., Dettori, G., Forcheri, P., Ierardi, M.G. (2004). Guidelines towards Effectively Sharable LOs. In: Liu, W., Shi, Y., Li, Q. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2004. ICWL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3143. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27859-7_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27859-7_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22542-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27859-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics