Skip to main content

Crossing Number Is Hard for Cubic Graphs

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2004 (MFCS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3153))

Abstract

It was proved by [Garey and Johnson, 1983] that computing the crossing number of a graph is an NP-hard problem. Their reduction, however, used parallel edges and vertices of very high degrees. We prove here that it is NP-hard to determine the crossing number of a simple cubic graph. In particular, this implies that the minor-monotone version of crossing number is also NP-hard, which has been open till now.

2000 Math Subjects Classification: 05C10, 05C62, 68R10

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fellows, M.R.: The Robertson–Seymour Theorems: A Survey of Applications. Contemp. Math. 89, 1–18 (1989)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Crossing number is NP-complete. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 4, 312–316 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Glebsky, L.Yu., Salazar, G.: The crossing number of Cm × Cn is as conjectured for n > m (m + 1). J. Graph Theory (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grohe, M.: Computing Crossing Numbers in Quadratic Time. In: 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing STOC 2001, pp. 231–236 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guy, R.K.: The decline and fall of Zarankiewic’s theorem. In: Harary, F. (ed.) Proc. Proof Techniques in Graph Theory, pp. 63–69. Academic Press, N.Y (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harary, F., Kainen, P.C., Schwenk, A.J.: Toroidal graphs with arbitrarily high crossing numbers. Nanta Math. 6, 58–67 (1973)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Klešč, M., Richter, R.B., Stobert, I.: The crossing number of C5 × Cn. J. Graph Theory 22, 239–243 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Pach, J., Tóth, G.: Which crossing number is it, anyway? In: Proc. 39th Foundations of Computer Science 1998, pp. 617–626. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richter, R.B.: A problem submitted to: Problems in Topological Graph Theory (D. Archdeacon), http://www.emba.uvm.edu/~archdeac/problems/problems.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hliněný, P. (2004). Crossing Number Is Hard for Cubic Graphs. In: Fiala, J., Koubek, V., Kratochvíl, J. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2004. MFCS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3153. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28629-5_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28629-5_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22823-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28629-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics