Skip to main content

Exploiting Background Knowledge when Learning Similarity Measures

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3155))

Abstract

The definition of similarity measures – one core component of every CBR application – leads to a serious knowledge acquisition problem if domain and application specific requirements have to be considered. To reduce the knowledge acquisition effort, different machine learning techniques have been developed in the past. In this paper, enhancements of our framework for learning knowledge-intensive similarity measures are presented. The described techniques aim to restrict the search space to be considered by the learning algorithm by exploiting available background knowledge. This helps to avoid typical problems of machine learning, such as overfitting the training data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AI Communications 7(l), 39–59 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann, R.: On the Use of Taxonomies for Representing Case Features and Local Similarity Measures. In: Proceedings of the 6th German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, R., Michael Richter, M., Schmitt, S., Stahl, A., Vollrath, I.: Utility-Oriented Matching: A New Research Direction for Case-Based Reasoning. In: Pro-fessionelles Wissensmanagement: Erfahrungen und Visionen. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Professional Knowledge Management, Shaker (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergmann, R., Stahl, A.: Similarity Measures for Object-Oriented Case Representations. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Branting, L.K.: Acquiring customer preferences from return-set selections. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, p. 59. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Coyle, L., Cunningham, P.: Exploiting Re-ranking Information in a Case-Based Personal Travel Assistent. In: Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Case-Based Reasoning at the 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gabel, T.: Learning Similarity Measures: Strategies to Enhance the Optimisation Process. Master thesis, Kaiserslautern University of Technology (2003), http://www.iupr.org/~stahl/Papers/GabelDA.ps

  8. Jarmulak, J., Craw, S., Rowe, R.: Genetic Algorithms to Optimise CBR Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stahl, A.: Learning Feature Weights from Case Order Feedback. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, p. 502. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Stahl, A.: Defining similarity measures: Top-down vs. Bottom-up. In: Craw, S., Preece, A.D. (eds.) ECCBR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2416, p. 406. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Stahl, A.: Learning of Knowledge-Intensive Similarity Measures in Case-Based Reasoning. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Kaiserslautern (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stahl, A., Gabel, T.: Using Evolution Programs to Learn Local Similarity Measures. In: Ashley, K.D., Bridge, D.G. (eds.) ICCBR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2689, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Wettschereck, D., Aha, D.W.: Weighting Features. In: Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Z., Yang, Q.: Dynamic Refinement of Feature Weights Using Quantitative Introspective Learning. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gabel, T., Stahl, A. (2004). Exploiting Background Knowledge when Learning Similarity Measures. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. ECCBR 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28631-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28631-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22882-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28631-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics