Skip to main content

Comparing Measures of Agreement for Agent Attitudes

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2004 (IDEAL 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3177))

  • 1275 Accesses

Abstract

A model for the interaction of three agents is presented in which each agent has three personality parameters; tolerance, volatility and stubbornness. A pair of agents interact and evolve their attitudes to each other as a function of how well they agree in their attitude towards the third agent in the group. The effects of using two different measures of agreement are compared and contrasted and it is found that although the measures used have quite different motivations and formulations, there are striking similarities between the overall results which they produce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Helbing, D.: Quantitative Sociodynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidsson, P.: Agent Based Simulation: A computer Science View. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (2002), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/5/1/7.html

  3. Liebrand, W.B.G.: In: Nowak, A., Hegselmann, R. (eds.) Computer Modelling of Social Processes, Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henrich, J., Gil-White, F.J.: The evolution of prestige Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior 22, 165–196 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCartney, M., Pearson, D.: Social Agents and Commonality. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2004) (submitted to)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Olsson, E.J.: What is the problem of coherence and truth? The Journal of Philosophy 99(5), 246–272 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Glass, D.H.: Coherence, explanation and Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the Irish conference in AI and Cognitive Science. Lecture notes in AI, vol. 2646, pp. 177–182. Springer, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCartney, M., Pearson, D.: Social Agents in Dynamic Equilibrium. In: Pearson, D.W., Steele, N.C., Albrecht, R.F. (eds.) Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms, pp. 256–259. Springer, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

McCartney, M., Glass, D.H. (2004). Comparing Measures of Agreement for Agent Attitudes. In: Yang, Z.R., Yin, H., Everson, R.M. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2004. IDEAL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28651-6_122

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28651-6_122

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22881-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28651-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics