Abstract
The design and deployment of collaboration technology has, until lately been more of an art than a science, but it has produced some solid successes. Commercial groupware products now support millions of collaborations per year. Under certain circumstances teams that use Group Support Systems perform far better than groups that do not. However, as impressive as the achievements are in this field, we can do better. A rigorous theoretical approach to the design of collaboration technology and process can lead us to non- intuitive design choices that produce successes beyond those possible with a seat-of-the-pants approach. This paper explains the simple structure of a rigorous scientific theory and offers examples of theory-driven design choices that produced substantial benefits. It then differentiates rigorous theory from several classes of theory that have intuitive appeal, but cannot inform design choices. It then argues that the logic of the theory-driven design approach suggests that the most useful focus for collaboration technology researchers would be the technology-supported work process, rather than just the technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agres, A., Vreede, G.J., Briggs, R.O.: A Tale of Two Cities: Case studies of GSS Transition in Two Organizations. In: 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 5-8, IEEE, Kona Hawaii (2004) ;On CD
Briggs, R.O.: The Focus Theory of Group Productivity and Its Application to the Design and Deployment of Collaboration Technologies. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona (1994)
Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.J., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 31–63 (2003)
Briggs, R.O., Adkins, M., Mittleman, D., Kruse, J., Miller, S., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: A Technology Transition Model Derived from Field Investigation of GSS use aboard U.S.S. CORONADO. Journal of Management Information Systems 15(3), 151–193 (Winter 1998-1999)
Connolly, T., Jessup, L.M., Valacich, J.S.: Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science 36(6), 689–703 (1990)
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)
Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 497–509 (1987)
Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 392–403 (1991)
Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: An assessment of Group Support Systems experimental research: methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15(3), 7–149 (1999)
Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: Group Support Systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(3), 112–157 (2001)
Gallupe, R.B., Bastianutti, L.M., Cooper, W.H.: Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology 76(1), 137–142 (1991)
Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Bastianutti, L.M., Nunamaker, J.F.: Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal 35, 350–369 (1992)
Goethals, G.R., Darley, J.M.: Social Comparison Theory: self-evaluation and group life. In: Mullen, B., Goethals, G.R. (eds.) Theories of Group Behavior, pp. 21–48. Springer, New York (1987)
Harkins, S.G., Jackson, J.M.: The role of evaluation in the elimination of social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11, 457–465 (1985)
Hender, J.M., Dean, D.L., Rodgers, T.L., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: An examination of the impact of stimuli type and GSS structure on creativity: Brainstorming versus nonbrainstorming techniques in a GSS environment. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(4), 59–85 (2002)
Kerr, N.L., Bruun, S.E.: Ringlean revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7, 224–231 (1981)
Kerr, N.L., Bruun, S.E.: Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44, 78–94 (1983)
Post, B.Q.: Building the Business Case for Group Support Technology. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, pp. 34–45. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1992)
Santanen, E.L., Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.J.: The Cognitive Network Model of Creativity: A New Causal Model of Creativity and a New Brainstorming Technique. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (2000)
Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., Connolly, T.: Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57, 448–467 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Briggs, R.O. (2004). On Theory-Driven Design of Collaboration Technology and Process. In: de Vreede, GJ., Guerrero, L.A., Marín Raventós, G. (eds) Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use. CRIWG 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3198. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30112-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30112-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23016-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30112-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive