Skip to main content

Handling Default Rules by Autistic Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3215))

  • 1081 Accesses

Abstract

We employ the formalism of default logic to model the phenomena of autistic reasoning. Our main finding is that while people with autism may be able to process single default rules, they have a characteristic difficulty in cases where two default rules conflict. Even though default reasoning was intended to simulate the reasoning of typical human subjects, it turns out that following the operational semantics of default reasoning in a literal way leads to the peculiarities of autistic behavior observed in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antoniou, G.: Nonmonotonic reasoning. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron-Cohen, S.: Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bratman, M.E.: Intention, plans and practical reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brewka, G., Dix, J., Konolige, K.: Nonmonotonic reasoning: an overview. In: CSLI Lecture Notes 73 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bochman, A.: A logical theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Galitsky, B.: Using mental simulator for emotional rehabilitation of autistic patients. In: FLAIRS 2003, St. Augustine, FL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galitsky, B.: Natural Language Question Answering System: Technique of Semantic Headers. In: Advanced Knowledge International, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Happe, F.G.: Studying weak central coherence at low levels: children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. A research note. J. Child Psychol Psychiatry 37(7), 873–877 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peterson, D.M., Bowler, D.M.: Counterfactual reasoning and false belief understanding in children with autism. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice 4(4), 391–405 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Russel, J. (ed.): Autism as an Executive Disorder. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peterson, D., Galitsky, B. (2004). Handling Default Rules by Autistic Reasoning. In: Negoita, M.G., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30134-9_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30134-9_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23205-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30134-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics