Skip to main content

Chameleon Hashing Without Key Exposure

  • Conference paper
Information Security (ISC 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3225))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Chameleon signatures are based on well established hash-and-sign paradigm, where a chameleon hash function is used to compute the cryptographic message digest. Chameleon signatures simultaneously provide the properties of non-repudiation and non-transferability for the signed message, i.e., the designated recipient is capable of verifying the validity of the signature, but cannot disclose the contents of the signed information to convince any third party without the signer’s consent.

One disadvantage of the initial chameleon signatures is that signature forgery results in the signer recovering the recipient’s trapdoor information, i.e., private key. Therefore, the signer can use this information to deny other signatures given to the recipient. This creates a strong disincentive for the recipient to forge signatures, partially undermining the concept of non-transferability. In this paper, we first propose a novel chameleon hashing scheme in the gap Diffie-Hellman group to solve the problem of key exposure. We can prove that the recipient’s trapdoor information will never be compromised under the assumption of Computation Diffie-Hellman Problem (CDHP) is intractable. Moreover, we use the proposed chameleon hashing scheme to design a chameleon signature scheme.

This work was supported by a grant No.R12-2003-004-01004-0 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ateniese, G., de Medeiros, B.: Identity-based chameleon hash and applications. In: Juels, A. (ed.) FC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3110, pp. 164–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (to appear) Cryptology ePrint Archive , http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/167

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Araki, S., Uehara, S., Imamura, K.: The limited verifier signature and its application. IEICE Trans. Fundamentals E82-A(1), 63–68 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bao, F., Deng, R., Zhu, H.: Variations of Diffie-Hellman problem. In: Qing, S., Gollmann, D., Zhou, J. (eds.) ICICS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2836, pp. 301–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyar, J., Chaum, D., Damgård, I.B.: Convertible undeniable signatures. In: Menezes, A., Vanstone, S.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 1990. LNCS, vol. 537, pp. 189–205. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boneh, D., Lynn, B., Shacham, H.: Short signatures from the Weil pairings. In: Boyd, C. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2248, pp. 514–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cha, J.C., Cheon, J.H.: An identity-based signature from gap Diffie-Hellman groups. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) PKC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2567, pp. 18–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chaum, D.: Designated confirmer signatures. In: De Santis, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 950, pp. 86–91. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaum, D.: Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures. In: Damgård, I.B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1990. LNCS, vol. 473, pp. 458–464. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chaum, D., van Antwerpen, H.: Undeniable signatures. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 212–216. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, X., Zhang, F., Kim, K.: Limited verifier signature from bilinear pairings. In: Jakobsson, M., Yung, M., Zhou, J. (eds.) ACNS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3089, pp. 135–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dodis, Y., Katz, J., Xu, S., Yung, M.: Key-insulated public-key cryptosystems. In: Knudsen, L.R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2332, pp. 65–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Desmedt, Y., Goutier, C., Bengio, S.: Special uses and abuses of the Fiat- Shamir passport protocol. In: Pomerance, C. (ed.) CRYPTO 1987. LNCS, vol. 293, pp. 21–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Desmedt, Y., Yung, M.: Weaknesses of undeniable signature schemes. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 205–220. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galbraith, S., Mao, W., Paterson, K.G.: RSA-based undeniable signatures for general moduli. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) CT-RSA 2002. LNCS, vol. 2271, pp. 200–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Galbraith, S., Mao, W.: Invisibility and anonymity of undeniable and confirmer signatures. In: Joye, M. (ed.) CT-RSA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2612, pp. 80–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gennaro, S., Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: RSA-based undeniable signatures. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 132–149. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hess, F.: Efficient identity based signature schemes based on pairingss. In: Nyberg, K., Heys, H.M. (eds.) SAC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2595, pp. 310–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Jakobsson, M.: Blackmailing using undeniable signatures. In: De Santis, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 950, pp. 425–427. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Jakobsson, M., Sako, K., Impagliazzo, R.: Designated verifier proofs and their applications. In: Maurer, U.M. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1070, pp. 143–154. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Chameleon hashing and signatures.In: Proc. of NDSS 2000, pp.143-154 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Libert, B., Quisquater, J.: ID-based undeniable signatures. In: CT-RSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 2694, pp. 112–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maurer, U.: Towards the equivalence of breaking the Diffie-Hellman protocol and computing discrete logatithms. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1994. LNCS, vol. 839, pp. 271–281. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Okamoto, T., Pointcheval, D.: The gap-problems: a new class of problems for the security of cryptographic Schemes. In: Kim, K.-c. (ed.) PKC 2001. LNCS, vol. 1992, pp. 104–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Steinfeld, R., Bull, L., Wang, H., Pieprzyk, J.: Universal designated-verifier signatures. In: Laih, C.-S. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2894, pp. 523–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Sadeghi, A., Steiner, M.: Assumptions related to discrete logarithms: why subtleties make a real difference. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 243–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, X., Zhang, F., Kim, K. (2004). Chameleon Hashing Without Key Exposure. In: Zhang, K., Zheng, Y. (eds) Information Security. ISC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3225. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30144-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30144-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23208-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30144-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics