Skip to main content

Managing Dynamic Repositories for Digital Content Components

  • Conference paper
Book cover Current Trends in Database Technology - EDBT 2004 Workshops (EDBT 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3268))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Semantic Web pursues interoperability at syntactic and semantic levels, to face the proliferation of data files with different purposes and representation formats. One challenge is how to represent such data, to allow users and applications to easily find, use and combine them. The paper proposes an infrastructure to meet those goals. The basis of the proposal is the notion of digital content components that extends the Software Engineering software component. The infrastructure offers tools to combine and extend these components, upon user request, managing them within dynamic repositories. The infrastructure adopt XML and RDF standards to foster interoperability, composition, adaptation and documentation of content data. This work was motivated by reuse needs observed in two specific application domains: education and agro-environmental planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ailamaki, A., Ioannidis, Y.E., Livny, M.: Scientific Workflow Management by Database Management. In: Proc. 10th IEEE International Conf. on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, pp. 190–201 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bachman, F., et al.: Technical Concepts of Component-Based Software Engineering, 2nd edn. vol. II, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-008, Carnegie Mellon University (July 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnell, A.: RDF Objects (November 2002) (accessed, October 2003), http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-315.pdf

  4. Conen, W., Klapsing, R.: A Logical Interpretation of RDF. Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science 5(13) (2000), http://www.ep.liu.se/ea/cis/2000/013/

  5. Dodds, P. (ed.): Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) – Version 1.2 – The SCORM Overview. Specification, Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative, (October 2001) (accessed, October 2003), http://www.adlnet.org/screens/shares/dsp_displayfile.cfm?fileid=840

  6. Eugster, P.T., Felber, P.A., Guerraoui, R., Kermarrec, A.-M.: The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Comput. Surv. 35(2), 114–131 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garzotto, F., Mainetti, L., Paolini, P.: Information Reuse in Hypermedia Applications. In: Proc. of the the 7th ACM conf. on Hypertext, pp. 93–104. ACM Press, New York (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. IEEE L.T.S.C. Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata – IEEE 1484.12.1-2002 (July 2002) (accessed, October 2003), http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf

  9. Meersman, R., Sheth, A.P.: Special Section on Semantic Web and Data Management – Guest editor’s introduction. ACM SIGMOD Record 31(4), 10–12 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nilsson, M.: IEEE Learning Object Metadata RDF binding (August 2002) (accessed on 11/2003), http://kmr.nada.kth.se/el/ims/md-lomrdf.html

  11. Prieto-Díaz, R.: Classification of reusable modules. In: Biggerstaff, T.J., Perlis, A.J. (eds.) Software reusability: Concepts and models, vol. 1, pp. 99–123. ACM Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raskin, R.: Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET). In: Proc. of NASA Earth Science Technology Conference 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rockley, A.: Fundamental Concepts of Content Reuse, ch. 2, pp. 23–42. New Riders, Indianapolis (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Santanchè, A., Teixeira, C.A.C.: Anima: Promoting Component Integration in the Web. In: Proc. of 7th Brasilian Symp. on Multimedia and Hypermedia Systems, pp. 261–268 (October 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seffino, L.A., Medeiros, C.B., Rocha, J.V., Yi, B.: WOODSS – A spatial decision support system based on workflows. Decision Support Systems 27(1–2), 105–123 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shanmugasundaram, J., et al.: A general technique for querying XML documents using a relational database system. ACM SIGMOD Record 30(3) (September 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw, M., Clements, P.C.: A Field Guide to Boxology: Preliminary Classification of Architectural Styles for Software Systems. In: Proc. of the 21st International Computer Software and Applications Conference, pp. 6–13. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide – W3C Candidate Recommendation (August 2003) (accessed, November 2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-guide-20030818/

  19. Smythe, C. (ed.): IMS Content Packaging Information Model. Specification, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (June 2003) (accessed, November 2003), http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging/

  20. Sugumaran, V., Storey, V.C.: A Semantic-Based Approach to Component Retrieval. SIGMIS Database 34(3), 8–24 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun Microsystems. OpenOffice.org Developer’s Guide (2003) (accessed, January 2003), http://api.openoffice.org/docs/DevelopersGuide/DevelopersGuide.pdf

  22. Taylor, R.N., Medvidovic, N., Anderson, K.M., Whitehead Jr., E.J., Robbins, J.E., Nies, K.A., Oreizy, P., Dubrow, D.L.: A Component- and Message-Based Architectural Style for GUI Software. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 22(6), 390–406 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thropp, S., McKell, M. (eds.): IMS Learning Resource Meta-Data XML Binding Specification (September 2001) (accessed, October 2003), http://www.imsglobal.org/metadata/imsmdv1p2p1/

  24. Zaremski, A.M., Wing, J.M.: Signature Matching, a Tool for Using Software Libraries. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (April 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zaremski, A.M., Wing, J.M.: Specification Matching of Software Components. In: Proc. of 3rd ACM SIGSOFT Symp. on the Foundations of Software Engineering (October 1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Santanchè, A., Medeiros, C.B. (2004). Managing Dynamic Repositories for Digital Content Components. In: Lindner, W., Mesiti, M., Türker, C., Tzitzikas, Y., Vakali, A.I. (eds) Current Trends in Database Technology - EDBT 2004 Workshops. EDBT 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3268. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30192-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30192-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23305-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30192-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics