Abstract
Resilience is becoming a key design issue for future IP-based networks having a growing commercial importance. In the case of element failures the networks have to reconfigure in the order of a few hundred milliseconds, i.e. much faster than provided by the slow rerouting of current implementations. Several multi-path extensions to IP and timer modifcations have been recently proposed providing interesting alternatives to the usage of of MPLS below IP. In this paper these approaches are first described in a common context and then compared by simulations using very detailed simulation models. As one of the main results it can be shown that an accelerated update of the internal forwarding tables in the nodes together with fast hardware-based failure detection are the most promising measures for reaching the required reconfiguration time orders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
UCB/LBNL/VINT, [Online] Available http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/
Haskin, D., Krishnan, R.: A method for setting an alternative label switched paths to handle fast reroute,” IETF. Internet Draft
Awduche, D., et al.: RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP tunnels. NWG, RFC 3209
Cisco Corp, [Online] Available http://www.cisco.com
Huitema, C.: Routing in the Internet, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (2000)
Moy, J.T.: OSPF: Anatomy of an Internet Routing Protocol (November 2000)
Shaikh, A., Greenberg, A.: Experience in black-box ospf measurement. In: ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (IMW) (November 2001)
Alaettinoglu, C., et al.: Toward millisecond IGP convergence. IETF. Internet Draft
Basu, A., Riecke, J.: Stability issues in OSPF routing. ACM SIGCOMM (August 2001)
Schollmeier, G., et al.: Improving the resilience in IP networks. In: HPSR (June 2003)
Moy, J.: OSPF version 2. NWG, RFC 2328
Sridharan, A., et al.: Achieving near-optimal traffic engineering solutions for current OSPF/IS-IS networks. In: INFOCOM 2003 (2003)
Ahn, G.: Mns, [Online] Available http://flower.ce.cnu.ac.kr/~fog1/mns/
Sun, M.: [Online] Available http://networks.ecse.rpi.edu/~sunmin/rtProtoLS/
Harrer, C.: Verhalten von IP-routingprotokollen bei ausfall von netzelementen. Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München, LKN (April 2001)
Himsolt, M.: Gml: A portable graph file format. Universität Passau, [Online] Available http://www.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de/Graphlet/GML/
Batchelor, P., et al.: Ultra high capacity optical transmission networks. COST 239. Final report of Action (January 1999)
Katz, D., Ward, D.: Bfd for ipv4 and ipv6 (single hop), IETF. Internet Draft
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pasqualini, S., Iselt, A., Kirstädter, A., Frot, A. (2004). MPLS Protection Switching Versus OSPF Rerouting. In: Solé-Pareta, J., et al. Quality of Service in the Emerging Networking Panorama. WQoSR QofIS ICQT 2004 2004 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3266. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30193-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30193-6_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23238-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30193-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive