Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3258))

  • 1570 Accesses

Abstract

The tightness of a constraint refers to how restricted the constraint is. The existing work shows that there exists a relationship between tightness and global consistency of a constraint network. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study on this relationship. Under the concept of k-consistency (k is a number), we strengthen the existing results by establishing that only some of the tightest, not all, binary constraints are used to predict a number k such that strong k-consistency ensures global consistency of an arbitrary constraint network which may include non-binary constraints. More importantly, we have identified a lower bound of the number of the tightest constraints we have to consider in predicting the number k. To make better use of the tightness of constraints, we propose a new type of consistency: dually adaptive consistency. Under this concept, only the tightest directionally relevant constraint on each variable (and thus in total n–1 such constraints where n is the number of variables) will be used to predict the level of “consistency” ensuring global consistency of a network.

This work has received support from Science Foundation Ireland under Grant 00/PI.1/C075.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dechter, R.: Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 113, 41–85 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dechter, R., Pearl, J.: Network-based heuristics for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence 34, 1–38 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Larrosa, J., Dechter, R.: Boosting search with variable elimination in constraint optimization and constraint satisfaction problems. Constraints 8(3), 303–326 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. van Beek, P., Dechter, R.: Constraint tightness and looseness versus local and global consistency. Journal of The ACM 44(4), 549–566 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Y., Yap, R.H.C.: Consistency and set intersection. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2003, pp. 263–268, Acapulco, Mexico(2003), IJCAI Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, Y. (2004). On Tightness of Constraints. In: Wallace, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2004. CP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3258. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30201-8_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30201-8_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23241-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30201-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics