Skip to main content

Evolutionary Multi-agent Systems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3242))

Abstract

In Multi-Agent learning, agents must learn to select actions that maximize their utility given the action choices of the other agents. Cooperative Coevolution offers a way to evolve multiple elements that together form a whole, by using a separate population for each element. We apply this setup to the problem of multi-agent learning, arriving at an evolutionary multi-agent system (EA-MAS). We study a problem that requires agents to select their actions in parallel, and investigate the problem solving capacity of the EA-MAS for a wide range of settings.

Secondly, we investigate the transfer of the COllective INtelligence(COIN) framework to the EA-MAS. COIN is a proved engineering approach for learning of cooperative tasks in MASs, and consists of re-engineering the utilities of the agents so as to contribute to the global utility. It is found that, as in the Reinforcement Learning case, the use of the Wonderful Life Utility specified by COIN also leads to improved results for the EA-MAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Jong, E.D., Pollack, J.B.: Ideal evaluation from coevolution. Evolutionary Computation 12(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grenager, T., Powers, R., Shoham, Y.: Dispersion games: general definitions and some specific learning results. In: AAAI 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guestrin, C., Koller, D., Gearhart, C., Kanodia, N.: Generalizing plans to new environments in relational MDPs. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kisiel-Dorohinicki, M., Socha, K.: Crowding Factor in Evolutionary Multi-Agent System For Multiobjective Optimization. In: Arabnia, H.R. (ed.) Proceedings of IC-AI 2001 – International Conference on Artificial Inteligence, June 2001, vol. 1, CSREA Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kok, J., Vlassis, N.: Sparse cooperative Q-learning. In: International Conference of Machine Learning (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miu, H.S., Leung, K.S., Leung, Y.: An evolutionary multi-agent system for object recognition in satellite images. In: The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2003, pp. 520–527 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nowé, A., Verbeeck, K.: Distributed Reinforcement Learning, loadbased routing a case study. In: Notes of the Neural, Symbolic and Reinforcement Methods for sequence Learning Workshop at IJCAI (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Potter, M.A., De Jong, K.A.: Cooperative coevolution: An architecture for evolving coadapted subcomponents. Evolutionary Computation 8(1), 1–29 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. ’t Hoen, P., Bohte, S.: COllective INtelligence with sequences of actions. In: Lavrač, N., Gamberger, D., Todorovski, L., Blockeel, H. (eds.) ECML 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2837, pp. 181–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoen, P., Bohte, S.: COllective INtelligence with task assignment. In: Proceedings of CDOCS 2003, fortcoming. Also available as TR. LNCS (LNAI), Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tumer, K., Wolpert, D.: COllective INtelligence and Braess’ paradox. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, August 2000, pp. 104–109 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Urquhart, N., Ross, P., Paechter, B., Chisholm, K.: Solving a real world routing problem using multiple evolutionary agents. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P.A., Beyer, H.-G., Fernández-Villacañas, J.-L., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2439, pp. 871–882. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, G. (ed.): Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wolpert, D., Tumer, K.: Optimal payoff functions for members of collectives. Advances in Complex Systems 4(2/3), 265–279 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolpert, D.H., Tumer, K., Frank, J.: Using collective intelligence to route internet traffic. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems-11, Denver, pp. 952–958 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wolpert, D.H., Wheeler, K.R., Tumer, K.: General principles of learning-based multi-agent systems. In: Etzioni, O., Müller, J.P., Bradshaw, J.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS 1999), May 1–5, pp. 77–83. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

’t Hoen, P.J., de Jong, E.D. (2004). Evolutionary Multi-agent Systems. In: Yao, X., et al. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN VIII. PPSN 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3242. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30217-9_88

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30217-9_88

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23092-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30217-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics