Abstract
In this paper we present an approach for predictive uncertainty modeling in field-based survey maps using Generalized Linear Models (GLM). Frequently, inherent uncertainty, especially in historical maps, makes the interpretation of objects very difficult. Such maps are of great value, but usually only few reference data are available. Consequently, the process of map interpretation could be greatly improved by the knowledge of uncertainty and its variation in space. To predict inherent uncertainty in forest cover information of the Swiss topographic map series from the 19th century we formulate rules from several predictors. These are topography-dependent variables and distance measures from old road networks. It is hypothesized that these rules best describe the errors of historical field work and hence the mapping quality. The uncertainty measure, the dependent variable, was derived from local map comparisons within moving windows of different sizes using a local community map as a reference map. The derivation of local Kappacoefficient and percent correctlyclassified from these enlarged sample plots takes the local distortion of the map into account. This allows an objective and spatially oriented comparison. Models fitted with uncertainty measures from 100m windows best described the relationship to the explanatory variables. A significant prediction potential for local uncertainty could thus be observed. The explained deviance by the Kappa-based model reached more than 40 percent. The correlation between predictions by the model and independent observations was ρ=0.76. Consequently, an improvement of the model to 47 percent, indicated by the G-value, was calculated. The model allows the spatial-oriented prediction of inherent uncertainty within different regions of comparable conditions. The integration of more study areas will result in more general rules for objective evaluation of the entire topographic map. The method can be applied for the evaluation of any field-based map which is used for subsequent applications such as land cover change assessments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agterberg, F.P.: Trend surface analysis. In: Gaile, G.L., Willmott, C.J. (eds.) Spatial Statistics and Model, Reide, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 147–171 (1984)
Austin, M.P.: Spatial prediction of species distribution: An interface between ecological theory and statistical modeling. Ecological Modelling 157, 189–207 (2002)
Brown, D.G.: Classification and boundary vagueness in mapping pre-settlement forest types. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12(2), 105–129 (1998)
Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S., Charlton, M.: Geographically weighted local statistics applied to binary data. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 38–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Cissel, J.H., Swanson, F.J., Weisberg, P.J.: Landscape management using historical fire regimes: Blue River, Oregon. Ecological Applications 9, 1217–1231 (1999)
Congalton, R.G.: A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37, 35–46 (1991)
Dobson, A.J.: An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2002)
Fielding, A.H.: How should accuracy be measured? In: Fielding, A. (ed.) Mashine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications, pp. 209–223. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)
Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F.: A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24(1), 38–49 (1997)
Fisher, P.: Models of uncertainty in spatial data. In: Longley, P., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D., Rhind, D. (eds.) Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications, vol. (1), pp. 191–205. Wiley & Sons, New York (1999)
Foody, G.M.: Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 80, 185–201 (2002)
Foody, G.M., Atkinson, P.M. (eds.): Uncertainty in Remote Sensing and GIS. Wiley, Chichester (2002)
Forbes, A.D.: Classification algorithm evaluation: five performance measures based on confusion matrices. Journal of Clinical Monitoring 11, 189–206 (1995)
Guisan, A., Edwards, T.C., Hastie, T.: Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distribution: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling 157, 89–100 (2002)
Guisan, A., Zimmermann, N.E.: Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135, 147–186 (2000)
Hagen, A.: Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17(3), 235–249 (2003)
Jäger, G., Benz, U.: Measures of classification accuracy based on fuzzy similarity. IEEE Transactions on GeoScience and Remote Sensing 38, 1462–1467 (2000)
Klir, G.J., Wierman, M.J.: Uncertainty-Based Information. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Leyk, S., Boesch, R., Weibel, R.: A conceptual framework for uncertainty investigation in map-based land cover change modelling. Transactions in GIS (2004) (forthcoming
Lewis, H.G., Brown, M.: A generalised confusion matrix for assessing area estimates from remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22, 3223–3235 (2001)
Manies, K.L., Mladenoff, D.J., Nordheim, E.V.: Assessing large-scale surveyor variability in the historic forest data of the original U.S. Public Land Surveys. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 1719–1730 (2001)
McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A.: Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London (1989)
Moisen, G.G., Edwards, T.C.: Use of generalized linear models and digital data in a forest inventory of northern Utah. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 4, 372–390 (1999)
Plewe, B.: The nature of uncertainty in historical geographic information. Transactions in GIS 6(4), 431–456 (2002)
Steele, B.M., Winne, J.C., Redmond, R.L.: Estimation and mapping of misclassification probabilities for thematic land cover maps. Remote Sensing of Environment 66, 192–202 (1998)
Stehman, S.V., Czaplewski, R.L.: Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: fundamental principles. Remote Sensing of Environment 64, 331–344 (1998)
Van Houwelingen, J.C., Le Cessie, S.: Predictive value of statistical models. Statistics in Medicine 9, 1303–1325 (1990)
Varzi, A.C.: Vagueness in geography. Philosophy and Geography 4(1), 49–65 (2001)
Weisberg, S.: Applied Linear Regression. Wiley, New York (1980)
Woodcock, C.E., Gopal, S.: Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14(2), 153–172 (2000)
Zhang, J., Goodchild, M.F.: Uncertainty in Geographical Information. Taylor & Francis, London (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leyk, S., Zimmermann, N.E. (2004). A Predictive Uncertainty Model for Field-Based Survey Maps Using Generalized Linear Models. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Freksa, C., Miller, H.J. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30231-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30231-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23558-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30231-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive