Skip to main content

Order-Preserving Transformations and Greedy-Like Algorithms

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3351))

Abstract

Borodin, Nielsen and Rackoff [5] proposed a framework for abstracting the main properties of greedy-like algorithms with emphasis on scheduling problems, and Davis and Impagliazzo [6] extended it so as to make it applicable to graph optimization problems. In this paper we propose a related model which places certain reasonable restrictions on the power of the greedy-like algorithm. Our goal is to define a model in which it is possible to filter out certain overly powerful algorithms, while still capturing a very rich class of greedy-like algorithms. We argue that this approach better motivates the lower-bound proofs and possibly yields better bounds. To illustrate the techniques involved we apply the model to the well-known problems of (complete) facility location and dominating set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelopoulos, S.: Randomized priority algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms, pp. 27–40 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angelopoulos, S., Borodin, A.: On the power of priority algorithms for facility location and set cover. In: Jansen, K., Leonardi, S., Vazirani, V.V. (eds.) APPROX 2002. LNCS, vol. 2462, pp. 26–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-Yehuda, R., Moran, S.: On approximation problems related to the independent set and vertex cover problems. Disc. Appl. Math. 9, 1–10 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Borodin, A., Boyar, J., Larsen, K.S.: Priority algorithms for graph optimization problems. In: Persiano, G., Solis-Oba, R. (eds.) WAOA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3351, pp. 126–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Borodin, A., Nielsen, M., Rackoff, C.: (Incremental) priority algorithms. Algorithmica 37, 295–326 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, S., Impagliazzo, R.: Models of greedy algorithms for graph problems. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feige, U.: A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. Journal of the ACM 45(4), 634–652 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Guha, S., Khuller, S.: Greedy strikes back: Improved facility location algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 649–657 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, K., Mahdian, M., Saberi, A.: A new greedy approach for facility location problems. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computation, pp. 731–740 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jain, K., Vazirani, V.V.: Approximation algorithms for metric facility location and k-median problems using the primal-dual schema and lagrangian relaxation. Journal of the ACM 48(2), 274–296 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, D.S.: Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. JCSS 9(3), 256–278 (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahdian, M., Markakis, E., Saberi, A., Vazirani, V.V.: A greedy facility location algorithm analyzed using dual fitting. In: Goemans, M.X., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Trevisan, L. (eds.) RANDOM 2001 and APPROX 2001. LNCS, vol. 2129, pp. 127–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahdian, M., Ye, J., Zhang, J.: Improved approximation algorithms for the partial vertex cover problem. In: Jansen, K., Leonardi, S., Vazirani, V.V. (eds.) APPROX 2002. LNCS, vol. 2462, pp. 161–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mettu, R.R., Plaxton, C.G.: The online median problem. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 339–348 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Regev, O.: Priority algorithms for makespan minimization in the subset model. IPL 84(3), 153–157 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Shmoys, D.B., Tardos, E., Aardal, K.: Approximation algorithms for facility location problems (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 265–274 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Angelopoulos, S. (2005). Order-Preserving Transformations and Greedy-Like Algorithms. In: Persiano, G., Solis-Oba, R. (eds) Approximation and Online Algorithms. WAOA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31833-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31833-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24574-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31833-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics