Abstract
The assessment of whether a statement is consistent with what has gone before is ubiquitous in discourse comprehension. One theory of the process is that individuals search for a mental model of a situation in which all the statements in the discourse are true. In the case of spatial descriptions, individuals should prefer to construct models, which retain the information in the description. Hence, they should use strategies that retain information in an efficient way. If the descriptions are consistent with multiple models then they are likely to run into difficulties. We report some preliminary results of experiments in which the participants judged the consistency of spatial descriptions. The participants made more errors when later assertions in the description conflicted with the preferred models of earlier assertions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental models. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Byrne, R.M., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 564–575 (1989)
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M.S.: Illusions in reasoning about consistency. Science 288, 531–532 (2000)
Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Models of consistency. Psychological Science 14, 131–137 (2003)
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C.: Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen’s calculus. In: 17th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 200–205. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1995)
Knauff, M.: The cognitive adequacy of Allen’s interval calculus for qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 261–290 (1999)
Payne, S.J.: Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace hypothesis. Memory & Cognition 21, 591–603 (1993)
Birney, D.P., Halford, G.S.: Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task. Thinking and Reasoning 8, 109–134 (2002)
Halford, G.S., Wilson, W.H., Phillips, S.: Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 803–864 (1998)
Mainwaring, S.D., Tversky, B., Ohgishi, M., Schiano, D.J.: Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial Cognition and Computation 3, 3–42 (2003)
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., Winter, A.: Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology 23, 515–557 (1991)
Linde, C., Labov, W.: Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language 51, 924–939 (1975)
Huttenlocher, J.: Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review 75, 550–560 (1968)
Taylor, H.A., Tversky, B.: Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 371–391 (1992)
Spivey, M.J., Tyler, M.J., Richardson, D.C., Young, E.E.: Eye movements during comprehension of spoken scene descriptions. In: 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 487–492. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)
Vandierendonck, A., Dierckx, V., De Vooght, G.: Mental model construction in linear reasoning: Evidence for the construction of initial annotated models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, Human Experimental Psychology (in press)
Schaeken, W., van der Henst, J.B., Schroyens, W.: The mental models theory of relational reasoning: Premise relevance, conclusion phrasing and cognitive economy. In: Schaeken, W., Vandierendock, A., Schroyens, W., d’Ydewalle, G. (eds.) The mental models theory of reasoning: Extensions and refinements, Erlbaum, Mahwah (in press)
Rauh, R.: Strategies of constructing preferred mental models in spatial relational inference. In: Schaeken, W., De Vooght, G., Vandierendonck, A., d’Ydewalle, G. (eds.) Deductive reasoning and strategies, pp. 177–190. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)
Levinson, S.: Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L., Garrett, M. (eds.) Language and space, pp. 109–169. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Barsalou, L.W.: Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577–660 (1999)
Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., Weidenfeld, A.: Two principles of premise integration in spatial reasoning. Memory & Cognition (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jahn, G., Johnson-Laird, P.N., Knauff, M. (2005). Reasoning About Consistency with Spatial Mental Models: Hidden and Obvious Indeterminacy in Spatial Descriptions. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds) Spatial Cognition IV. Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3343. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25048-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32255-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)