Skip to main content

Debugging Agent Behavior in an Implemented Agent System

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3346))

Abstract

As agent systems become more sophisticated, there is a growing need for agent-oriented debugging, maintenance, and testing methods and tools. This paper presents the Tracing Method and accompanying Tracer tool to help debug agents by explaining actual agent behavior in the implemented system. The Tracing Method captures dynamic run-time data by logging actual agent behavior, creates modeled interpretations in terms of agent concepts (e.g. beliefs, goals, and intentions), and analyzes those models to gain insight into both the design and the implemented agent behavior. An implementation of the Tracing Method is the Tracer tool, which is demonstrated in a target-monitoring domain. The Tracer tool can help (1) determine if agent design specifications are correctly implemented and guide debugging efforts and (2) discover and examine motivations for agent behaviors such as beliefs, communications, and intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The GAIA methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3, 285–312 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DeLoach, S.A., Wood, M.F., Sparkman, C.H.: Multiagent systems engineering. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 11, 231–258 (2001); World Scientific Publishing Company

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dignum, V., Vazquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F.: OMNI: Introducing social structure, norms and ontologies into agent organizations. In: Second International Workshop on Programming Multi-Agent Systems at the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, New York, NY, pp. 91–102 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. JADE: Java agent development framework (2000), http://sharon.cselt.it/projects/jade/

  5. Nwana, H.S., Ndumu, D.T., Lee, L.C., Collis, J.C.: ZEUS: A toolkit for building distributed multi-agent systems. In: Etzioni, O., Muller, J.P., Bradshaw, J.M. (eds.) Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Seattle, WA, pp. 360–361. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Poslad, S., Buckle, P., Hadingham, R.: The FIPA-OS agent platform: Open source for open standards. In: Fifth International Conference and Exhibition on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents, Manchestor, UK, pp. 355–368 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gasser, L., Braganza, C., Herman, N.: MACE: A flexible testbed for distributed AI research. In: Huhns, M.N. (ed.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 119–152. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doi, T., Yoshioka, N., Tahara, Y., Honiden, S.: Bridging the gap between AUML and implementation using FOPL. In: Second International Workshop on Programming Multi-Agent Systems at the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, New York, NY, pp. 69–78 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W., Moldt, D.: Goal representation for BDI agent systems. In: Second International Workshop on Programming Multi-Agent Systems at the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, New York, NY, pp. 9–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jennings, N.R.: Agent-oriented software engineering. In: Garijo, F.J., Boman, M. (eds.) MAAMAW 1999. LNCS, vol. 1647, pp. 1–7. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross, R., Collier, R., O’Hare, G.M.: AF-APL – bridging principles & practice in agent oriented languages. In: Second International Workshop on Programming Multi-Agent Systems at the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, New York, NY, pp. 21–33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suna, A., Fallah-Seghrouchni, A.E.: A mobile agents platform: Architecture, mobility and security elements. In: Second International Workshop on Programming Multi-Agent Systems at the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, New York, NY, pp. 57–66 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Devanbu, P.T.: GENOA- a customizable, language- and front-end independent code analyzer. In: Fourteenth International Conference on Software Engineering, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 307–319 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Biggerstaff, T.J., Mitbander, B.G., Webster, D.: Program understanding and the concept assignment problem. Communications of the ACM 37, 72–83 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barber, K.S., Lam, D.: Enabling abductive reasoning for agent software comprehension. In: 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Workshop on Agents and Automated Reasoning, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 7–13 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sun Microsystems, Inc.: Java Logging API (2002), http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/guide/util/logging

  17. Grahlmann, B., Pohl, C.: Profiting from SPIN in PEP. In: SPIN 1998 Workshop (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bose, P.: Automated translation of uml models of architectures for verification and simulation using SPIN. In: IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 102–109 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barber, K.S., Graser, T.J., Holt, J.: Providing early feedback in the development cycle through automated application of model checking to software architectures. In: 16th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, San Diego, CA, pp. 341–345 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bordini, R.H., Fisher, M., Pardavila, C., Wooldridge, M.: Model checking AgentSpeak. In: Rosenschein, J.S., Sandholm, T., Michael, W., Yokoo, M. (eds.) Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 409–416. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Edmonds, B., Bryson, J.: The insufficiency of formal design methods. In: Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 938–946 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lam, D.N., Barber, K.S. (2005). Debugging Agent Behavior in an Implemented Agent System. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds) Programming Multi-Agent Systems. ProMAS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3346. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32260-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32260-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24559-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32260-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics