Skip to main content

Layered Strategies and Protocols for Argumentation-Based Agent Interaction

  • Conference paper
Book cover Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3366))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Communication between agents needs to be flexible enough to encompass together a variety of different aspects such as, conformance to society protocols, private tactics of the individual agents, strategies that reflect different classes of agent types (or personal attitudes) and adaptability to the particular external circumstances at the time when the communication takes place. In this paper we propose an argument-based framework for representing communication theories of agents that can take into account in a uniform way these different aspects. We show how this approach can be used to realize existing types of dialogue strategies and society protocols in a way that facilitates their modular development and extension to make them more flexible in handling different or special circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S.: Agent dialogue with conflicting preferences. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, p. 190. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. GORGIAS: A system for argumentation and abduction (2002), http://www.cs.ucy.ac.cy/nkd/gorgias

  4. Kakas, A., Mancarella, P., Dung, P.M.: The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G.: Dynamic argument systems: a formal model of argumentation based on situation calculus. Journal of logic and computation 11 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4, 331–368 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Argumentation-based communication between agents. In: Huget, M.-P. (ed.) Communication in Multiagent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2650, pp. 164–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Karacapilidis, N., Moraitis, P.: Engineering issues in interagent dialogues. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. FIPA: Foundation for intelligent physical agents. Communicative act library specification (xc00037h) (2001), http://www.fipa.org/spec

  11. McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sadri, F., Toni, F., Torroni, P.: Dialogues for negotiation: agent varieties and dialogue sequences. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, p. 405. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argument-based negotiation. Knowledge Engineering Review (2004) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, M.P.: A social semantics for agent communication language. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Greaves, M. (eds.) Issues in Agent Communication. LNCS, vol. 1916. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., van der Torre, L.: The BOID architecture: conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In: Proceedings of AGENTS 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Endriss, U., Maudet, N., Sadri, F., Toni, F.: Protocol conformance for logic-based agents. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Flexible protocol specification and execution: applying event calculus planning using commitments. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kakas, A., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P. (2005). Layered Strategies and Protocols for Argumentation-Based Agent Interaction. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3366. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24526-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32261-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics