This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ardis M, Weiss D.: Defining Families: The Commonality Analysis. ICSE 97 Tutorial 4D (1997).
Atkinson C. Bayer J., Muthig D.: Component-Based Product Line Engineering: The KobrA Approach. In Proceedings of the First International Product Line Conference (SPLC1). Denver, Colorado, USA, (2000) 289-310.
Atkinson, C. Bayer, J. Bunse, C. Kamsties, E. Laitenberger, O. Laqua, R. Muthig, D. Paech, B. Wüst, J., Zettel J.: Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley (2001).
Bayer, J., Flege, O., Knauber, P., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Schmid, K., Widen, T., DeBaud, J.-M.: PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines. Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR'99) (1999) 122-131.
Becker M, Geyer L, Gilbert A, Becker K.: Comprehensive Variability Modelling to Facilitate Efficient Variability Treatment, PFE 2001, (2001) 294-303.
Becker M.: Towards a General Model of Variability in Product Families. In Software Variability Management Workshop (2003) 19-27.
Cerón, R., J.L. Arciniegas, J.L. Ruiz, J.C. Dueñas, J. Bermejo, and R. Capilla. Architectural Modelling in Product Family Context. in Software Architecture, First European Workshop, EWSA 2004. St An-drews, UK, Springer LNCS 3047 (2004) 25-42.
Clauss, M.: Generic Modelling using UML extensions for variability. Presented at OOPSLA workshop 2001, Tampa Bay, Florida, USA (2001).
Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.: Generative Programming, Methods, Tools, and Applications, Addison-Wesley. (2000).
Dobrica L, Niemelä E.: UML Notation Extension for Product Line Architectures Modelling. In Pro- ceedings of International Workshop on Software Variability Management (SVM), ICSE'03 (2003) 8-13.
Engineering Software Architectures, Processes and Platforms for System-Families (ESAPS), Eureka 2034, ITEA project 99005, http://www.esi.es/esaps/.
From Concepts to Application in System-Family Engineering (CAFÉ), Eureka 2023, ITEA project ip00004, http://www.esi.es/Cafe/.
Gérard, S., Terrier, F., Tanguy Y.: Using the Model Paradigm for Real-Time Systems Development: ACCORD/UML. OOIS ’ 02-MDSD. Montpellier: Springer LNCS 2426 (2002) 260-269.
Gérard, S., The ACCORD/UML methodology. Internal report CEA-List, Paris. (2003).
Greenfield, J., Short, K.: Software Factories: Assembling Applications with Patterns, Frameworks, Models & Tools, John Wiley & Sons (2004).
Haugen, O., Møller-Pedersen, B., Oldevik J.: Comparison of System Family Modeling Approaches. SPLC 2005. Rennes, France. Springer LNCS 3714 (2005) 102-112.
ITU, Recommendation Z.100, ITU Specification and Description Language. Reed, R. Editor., ITU-T: Geneva. (1999) 300p.
Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) ASEI technical report: CMU/SEI-90-TR-21. (1990).
Kang, Lee, Lee, Kim.: Feature Oriented Product Line Software Engineering: Principles and Guidelines Book Chapter: Domain Oriented Systems Development - Practices and Perspectives, UK, Gordon Breach Science Publishers, (2002).
Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P., Visual domain-specific modelling: Benefits and experiences of using meta-CASE tools, International workshop on Model Engineering, ECOOP 2000, (ed. Bezivin, J., Ernst, J.) (2000).
Kelly, S., Tools for Domain-Specific Modeling. Dr. Dobb’s journal, September, (2004).
Kieburtz, R. et al.: A Software Engineering Experiment in Software Component Generation, Proceed-ings of 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, Berlin, IEEE Computer Society Press. (1996) 542-553.
Muthig D.: A Light-weight Approach Facilitating an Evolutionary Transition Towards Software Prod-uct Lines, Ph.D. Thesis, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, (2002).
OMG Unified Modelling Language: Superstructure, Version 2.0, formal/05-07-04, OMG (2005).
Rioux, L., et al.: Style, structures and views for handling commonalities and variabilities. Eureka 6! 2023 Programme, ITEA project 99005 (2001).
Tolvanen, J-.P.: Keeping it in the family, Application Development Advisor, July-August, 2002, 101 Communications (2002).
Weiss, D., Lai, C. T. R.: Software Product-line Engineering, Addison Wesley (1999).
Ziadi, T., Jézéquel, J.-M., Fondement, F.: Product line derivation with UML. Software Variability Management Workshop.. University of Groningen Department of Mathematics and Computing Sci-ence (2003).
Ziadi, T., Helouet, L., Jezequel, J.-M.: Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines. Fifth Inter-national Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-05). Siena, Italy. LNCS 3014 (2003) 129-139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayer, J. et al. (2006). Consolidated Product Line Variability Modeling. In: Käköla, T., Duenas, J.C. (eds) Software Product Lines. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33252-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33253-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)