Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3977))

Abstract

There has been much debate over how to interpret the structure in queries that contain structural hints. At INEX 2003 and 2004, there were two interpretations: SCAS in which the user specified target element was interpreted strictly, and VCAS in which it was interpreted vaguely. But how many ways are there that the query could be interpreted? In the investigation at INEX 2005 (discussed herein) four different interpretations were proposed, and compared on the same queries. Those interpretations (SSCAS, SVCAS, VSCAS, and VVCAS) are the four interpretations possible by interpreting the target elements, and the support elements, either strictly or vaguely. An analysis of the submitted runs shows that those that share an interpretation of the target element correlate – that is, the previous decision to divide CAS into the SCAS and VCAS (as done at INEX 2003 and 2004) was sound. The analysis is supported by the fact that the best performing VSCAS run was submitted to the VVCAS task and the best performing SVCAS run was submitted to the SSCAS task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fuhr, N., Gövert, N., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M.: INEX: Initiative for the evaluation of XML retrieval. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000 Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harman, D.: Overview of the first TREC conference. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGIR Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 36–47 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kazai, G., Lalmas, M.: INEX 2005 evaluation metrics. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pehcevski, J., Thom, J.A., Vercoustre, A.-M.: Users and assessors in the context of INEX: Are relevance dimensions relevant? In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977, pp. 47–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Piwowarski, B., Lalmas, M.: Interface pour l’évaluation de systèmes de recherche sur des documents XML. In: Proceedings of the Premiere COnference en Recherche d’Information et Applications, CORIA 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Piwowarski, B., Lalmas, M.: Providing consistent and exhaustive relevance assessments for XML retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pp. 361–370 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sigurbjörnsson, B., Trotman, A., Geva, S., Lalmas, M., Larsen, B., Malik, S.: INEX 2005 guidelines for topic development. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tombros, A., Larsen, B., Malik, S.: The interactive track at INEX 2004. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Szlávik, Z. (eds.) INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493, pp. 410–423. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Trotman, A.: Wanted: Element retrieval users. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977, pp. 63–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trotman, A., Sigurbjörnsson, B.: Narrowed Extended XPath I (NEXI). In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Szlávik, Z. (eds.) INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493, pp. 16–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Trotman, A., Sigurbjörnsson, B.: NEXI, now and next. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Szlávik, Z. (eds.) INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493, pp. 41–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Voorhees, E.M.: The philosophy of information retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the The Second Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum on Evaluation of Cross-Language Information Retrieval Systems, pp. 355–370 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Woodley, A., Geva, S.: NLPX at INEX 2004. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Szlávik, Z. (eds.) INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493, pp. 382–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodley, A., Geva, S.: Fine tuning INEX. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977, pp. 70–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zobel, J.: How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments? In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGIR Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 307–314 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trotman, A., Lalmas, M. (2006). The Interpretation of CAS. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds) Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation. INEX 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3977. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34963-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34963-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34962-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34963-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics