Skip to main content

New Challenges for Defining Information Fusion Requirements

  • Conference paper
Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

  • 738 Accesses

Abstract

The changing geopolitical landscape in the world has been and will continue to be the driving framework within which requirements for new and adaptable capabilities in Information Fusion (IF) technology are defined. For major nation-states of the world, this changing landscape will, it is argued, generate new challenges that significantly broaden both the range and adaptive nature of the capability that future IF systems must have. Another dramatically changing landscape is that of information networking, and the integration and exploitation of such networking in military and defense operations have led to transformations in military thinking and culture, even to the consideration of radically new socio-organizational dynamics for Command and Control (C2). Further, the need to develop deeper insights into agile and creative adversarial behaviors imparts what is called here the need for a “multi-perspective” Information Fusion process that will require new ways to think about exploiting both traditional and novel Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) sources. Further, there is the impact of informational dimensionality via the need, similarly motivated, to fuse and exploit the “PMESII” (Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, Information) spectrum of information. Lastly, there is the desire on the part of the military to focus on “Effects-based” operations; here too there is an impact of new requirements onto the Data Fusion process.

These extensive changes in both the application context and the technological foundations for IF have far-reaching implications for the both the architectural design of IF processes as well as the foundational algorithms employed in IF systems. Significant challenges exist toward achieving robustness and scalability of IF capabilities, the role of and support to human involvement on the IF process, and the ability of IF systems to estimate not only states in the physical domain but also in the informational and cognitive domains. This paper and presentation will survey this extensive new and changing landscape as regards the impacts on IF requirements, with some thoughts on new strategies for IF process design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/areas/worldconflicts.htm

    Google Scholar 

  2. www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0904550.html

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mazaar, M.J., “Extremism, Terror, and the Future of Conflict”, Policy Review March 6, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quadrennial Defense Review Report, Feb 6, 2006 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/dod/qdr-2006-report.htm

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chong, C., “Problem characterization in tracking/fusion algorithm evaluation” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Volume 16, Issue 7, July 2001 Page(s):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfram Math World, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Domain.html

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chao, A.I., et al, “An extensible, ontology-based, distributed information system architecture”, Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, Volume 1, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sterritt, R. and Bustard, D., “Towards an Autonomic Computing Environment”, 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evidence Based Research, Inc., “Network Centric Operations Conceptual Framework Version 1.0”, Prepared for Office of Force Transformation, November 2003

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alberts, D. S. and Hayes, R. E. “Power to the Edge: Command and Control in the Information Age.” Command and Control Research Program publications, (June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ilachinski, A., “Land Warfare and Complexity, Part I: Mathematical Background and Technical Sourcebook”, US Center for Naval Analyses, July 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davis, Paul K. “Effects-Based Operations: A Grand Challenge for the Analytical Community”, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Ca., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Biggie, J., Operational Net Assessment Concept Description, Nov 2003 http://www.mors.org/meetings/decision_aids/da_pres/Biggie.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vane, R., et al, “Urban Sunrise”, US Air Force Research Lab report AFRLIF-RS-TR-2004-22, Final Technical Report, February 2004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Llinas, J. (2007). New Challenges for Defining Information Fusion Requirements. In: Popovich, V.V., Schrenk, M., Korolenko, K.V. (eds) Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37629-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics