Skip to main content

Presenting Sets of Problem Solutions Concisely

  • Conference paper
KI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2821))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Improvements in formal reasoning systems enable these systems to produce large sets of solutions that may grow rather complex. However, automatically generated presentations of these data lack a sufficient degree of conciseness. In order to improve the presentation of problem solutions that can be casted in terms of sets of ground atoms, we adapt linguistic aggregation techniques to specificities of formal problems. We define novel constructs that can express sets of propositions with highly regular alternations on predicate argument values concisely, including special forms of disjunctions and versions for formulas. We demonstrate applications to model generation and to categorization proofs. The presentations obtained highlight commonalities among and differences across solution parts in a much better way than previous approaches do, thereby supporting the inspection of properties holding across several solutions, and the discovery of flaws in problem specifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Busemann, S.: Best-First Generation. In: Proc. of the 8th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Hearstmonceaux, UK, pp. 101–110 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colton, S., Bundy, A., Walsh, T.: Automatic Concept Formation in Pure Mathematics. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1999, Stockholm, pp. 786–793 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coscoy, Y., Kahn, G., Théry, L.: Extracting Text from Proof. Typed Lambda Calculus and its Application (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dahn, I.: Using ILF as a User Interface for Many Theorem Provers. In: Proc. of User Interfaces for Theorem Provers, Eindhoven (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dalianis, H.: Aggregation in Natural Language Generation. Computational Intelligence 15(4) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freihat, H.: Realisierung aggregierter Ausdrücke in mehreren Sprachen und mit Formeln. Master thesis, University of the Saarland (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giunchiglia, F., Villafiorita, A., Walsh, T.: Theories of Abstrction. AI Communications 10(3-4), 167–176 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horacek, H., Konrad, K.: Presenting Herbrand Models with Linguistically Motivated Techniques. In: Proc. of CIMCA 1999, Vienna (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, X., Fiedler, A.: Proof Verbalization as an Application of NLG. In: 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 965–970 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Konrad, K., Wolfram, D.: System Description: Kimba, A Model Generator for Many-Valued First-Order Logics. In: 16th Proc. of CADE, Trento, Italy, pp. 282–286 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mann, B., Moore, J.: Computer as Author – Results and Prospects. Research Report ISI/RR-79-82, Univ. of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mann, B., Moore, J.: Computer Generation of Multiparagraph English Text. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 8(2), 17–29 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meier, A., Pollet, M., Sorge, V.: Comparing Approaches to Explore the Domain of Residue Classes. Journal of Symbolic Computation 34(4), 287–306 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Reape, M., Mellish, C.: What is Aggregation Anyhow? In: Proc. of 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Toulouse, France (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw, J.: Segregatory Coordination and Ellipsis in Text Generation. In: Proc. of the 36th ACL and the 17th COLING, pp. 1220–1226 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shaw, J.: Clause Aggregation Using Linguistic Knowledge. In: Proc. of the 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 138–147 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siekmann, J., Benzmüller, C., Brezhnev, V., Cheikhrouhou, L., Fiedler, A., Franke, A., Horacek, H., Kohlhase, M., Meier, A., Melis, E., Moschner, M., Normann, I., Pollet, M., Sorge, V., Ullrich, C., Wirth, C.-P., Zimmer, J.: Proof Development with 0MEGA. In: Proc. of the 18th CADE-02, Kopenhagen, pp. 144–149 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stickel, M.: Schubert’s Steamroller Problem: Formalisation and Solutions. Journal of Automated Reasoning 2(1), 89–101 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horacek, H. (2003). Presenting Sets of Problem Solutions Concisely. In: Günter, A., Kruse, R., Neumann, B. (eds) KI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2821. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39451-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39451-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20059-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39451-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics