Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2757))

Abstract

Software construction is essentially a modeling task. The most important decisions in software development are decisions that deal with modeling. The better, the more adequate and more powerful the available modeling paradigms are, the easier the program development task is and the better its results are. However, a large complex software system can hardly be described and understood by providing one huge model. Instead a number of partial models are used that describe certain aspects of software systems in so-called views and that are in certain mutual relationships such as in levels of abstraction. In the following we describe the role of models and views in program development and show how closely the issue of modeling is related to the so- called formal methods in program development. Moreover, we give a comprehensive family of models of aspects of software systems and show how to relate and integrate them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baeten, J.C.M., Bergstra, J.: Process Algebras with Signals and Conditions. In: Broy, M. (ed.) Programming and Mathematical Method. NATO ASI Series, Series F: Computer and System Sciences, vol. 88, pp. 273–324. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Abdallah, H., Leue, S.: Timing Constraints in Message Sequence Charts Specifictions. In: Proceeding of the FORTE/PSTV 1997 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Booch, G.: Object Oriented Design with Applications. Benjamin Cummings, Redwood City (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broy, M.: Towards a formal foundation of the specification and description language SDL. Formal Aspects of Computing 3, 21–57 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Broy, M.: Compositional Refinement of Interactive Systems Modelled by Relations, Malente (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broy, M., Hofmann, C., Krüger, I., Schmidt, M.: A Graphical Description Technique for Communication in Software Architectures. Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, TUM-I9705 (February 1997), URL: http://www4.informatik.tumuenchen.de/reports/TUM-I9705 ; Also in: Joint 1997 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference and International Computer Science Conference (APSEC 1997/ICSC 1997)

  7. Broy, M., Stølen, K.: Specification and Development of Interactive Systems: FOCUS Focus on Streams, Interfaces, and Refinement. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Milner, R.: A Calculus of Communication Systems. LNCS, vol. 92. Springer, Heidelberg (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Damm, W., Harel, D.: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts. Weismann Insitute Tech. Report CS98-09 (April 1998); revised July 1998, to appear in: FMOODS 1999, IFIP TC6/WG6.1 Third International Conference on, Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems, Florence, Italy, February 15-18 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berry, G., Gonthier, G.: The Esterel Synchronous Programming Language: Design, Semantics, Implementation. INRIA, Research Report 842 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hettler, R.: Zur Übersetzung von E/R-Schemata nach Spectrum. Technischer Bericht TUM-I9409, TU München (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hinkel, U.: Formale, semantische Fundierung und ein darauf abgestützte Verifikationsmethode für SDL. Dissertation, Fakultät für Informatik, Technische Universität München (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoare, C.A.R., Brookes, S.D., Roscoe, A.W.: A theory of communicating sequential processes. Oxford University Computing Laboratory Programming Research Group, Technical Monograph PRG-21, Oxford (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobsen, I.: Object-Oriented Software Engineering. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kahn, G.: The Semantics of a Simple Language for Parallel Processing. In: Rosenfeld, J.L. (ed.) Information Processing 74, Proc. of the IFIP Congress 74, pp. 471–475. North Holland, Amsterdam (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klein, C.: Anforderungsspezifikation durch Transitionssysteme und Szenarien. Promotion, Fakultät für Informatik, Technische Universität München (Dezember 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krüger, I., Grosu, R., Scholz, P., Broy, M.: From MSCs to statecharts. In: Proceedings of DIPES 1998. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ITU-T Criteria for the Use and Applicability of Formal Description Techniques. Recommendation Z. 120, Message Sequence Chart (MSC), 35pgs (March 1993) (previously CCITT)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ITU-T. Recommendation Z.120, Annex B: Algebraic Semantics of Message Sequence Charts. ITU-Telecommunication Standardization Sector, Geneva, Switzerland (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ladkin, P.B., Leue, S.: Interpreting Message Flow Graphs. Formal Aspects of Computing 7(5), 473–509 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Selic, B., Gullekson, G., Ward, P.T.: Real-time Objectoriented Modeling. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rumbaugh, J.: Object-Oriented Modelling and Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rumpe, B.: Formale Methodik des Entwurfs verteilter objektorientierter Systeme. Ph.D. Thesis Technische Universität München, Fakultät für Informatik (1996) (published by Herbert Utz Verlag)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Specification and Description Language (SDL), Recommendation Z.100. Technical report, CCITT (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Broy, M., Facchi, C., Hettler, R., Hußmann, H., Nazareth, D., Regensburger, F., Slotosch, O., Stølen, K.: The Requirement and Design Specification Language Spectrum. An Informal Introduction. Version 1.0. Part I/II Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, TUM-I9311 / TUM-I9312 (May 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language for Object- Oriented Development, Version 1.0, RATIONAL Software Cooperation

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zave, P., Jackson, M.: Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (January 1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broy, M. (2003). Multi-view Modeling of Software Systems. In: Aichernig, B.K., Maibaum, T. (eds) Formal Methods at the Crossroads. From Panacea to Foundational Support. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2757. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40007-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40007-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20527-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40007-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics