Skip to main content

Expectation Maximization Strategies for Multi-atlas Multi-label Segmentation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2732))

Abstract

It is well-known in the pattern recognition community that the accuracy of classifications obtained by combining decisions made by independent classifiers can be substantially higher that the accuracy of the individual classifiers. In order to combine multiple segmentations we introduce two extensions to an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm for ground truth estimation based on multiple experts (Warfield et al., MICCAI 2002). The first method repeatedly applies the Warfield algorithm with a subsequent integration step. The second method is a multi-label extension of the Warfield algorithm. Both extensions integrate multiple segmentations into one that is closer to the unknown ground truth than the individual segmentations. In atlas-based image segmentation, multiple classifiers arise naturally by applying different registration methods to the same atlas, or the same registration method to different atlases, or both. We perform a validation study designed to quantify the success of classifier combination methods in atlas-based segmentation. By applying random deformations, a given ground truth atlas is transformed into multiple segmentations that could result from imperfect registrations of an image to multiple atlas images. We demonstrate that a segmentation produced by combining multiple individual registration-based segmentations is more accurate for the two EM methods we propose than for simple label averaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dawant, B.M., Hartmann, S.L., Thirion, J.P., et al.: Automatic 3-D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations: Part I, methodology and validation on normal subjects. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18(10), 909–916 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., et al.: Segmentation of three-dimensional images using non-rigid registration: Methods and validation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. In: Medical Imaging: Image Processing, Proceedings of SPIE (February 2003) (in print)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Warfield, S.K., Zou, K.H., Wells, W.M.: Validation of image segmentation and expert quality with an expectation-maximization algorithm. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2488, pp. 298–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., et al.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 20(3), 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., et al.: Multimodality image registration by maximisation of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16(2), 187–198 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., et al.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18(8), 712–721 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sederberg, T.W., Parry, S.R.: Free-form deformation and solid geometric models. Comput. Graph (ACM) 20(4), 151–160 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Maurer Jr., C.R., et al.: Bee brains, B-splines and computational democracy: Generating an average shape atlas. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 187–194. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, L., Krzyzak, A., Suan, C.Y.: Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22(3), 418–435 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rohlfing, T., Russakoff, D.B., Maurer, C.R. (2003). Expectation Maximization Strategies for Multi-atlas Multi-label Segmentation. In: Taylor, C., Noble, J.A. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2732. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40560-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45087-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics