Skip to main content

Which Is the Worst-Case Nash Equilibrium?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2003 (MFCS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2747))

Abstract

A Nash equilibrium of a routing network represents a stable state of the network where no user finds it beneficial to unilaterally deviate from its routing strategy. In this work, we investigate the structure of such equilibria within the context of a certain game that models selfish routing for a set of n users each shipping its traffic over a network consisting of m parallel links. In particular, we are interested in identifying the worst-case Nash equilibrium – the one that maximizes social cost. Worst-case Nash equilibria were first introduced and studied in the pioneering work of Koutsoupias and Papadimitriou [9].

More specifically, we continue the study of the Conjecture of the Fully Mixed Nash Equilibrium, henceforth abbreviated as FMNE Conjecture, which asserts that the fully mixed Nash equilibrium, when existing, is the worst-case Nash equilibrium. (In the fully mixed Nash equilibrium, the mixed strategy of each user assigns (strictly) positive probability to every link.) We report substantial progress towards identifying the validity, methodologies to establish, and limitations of, the FMNE Conjecture.

This work has been partially supported by the IST Program of the European Union under contract numbers IST-1999-14186 (ALCOM-FT) and IST-2001-33116 (FLAGS), by funds from the Joint Program of Scientific and Technological Collaboration between Greece and Cyprus, by research funds at University of Cyprus, and by the VEGA grant No. 2/3164/23.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Czumaj, A., Vöcking, B.: Tight Bounds forWorst-Case Equilibria. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 413–420 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldmann, R., Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Monien, B., Rode, M.: Nashification and the Coordination Ratio for a Selfish Routing Game. In: 30th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fotakis, D., Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: The Structure and Complexity of Nash Equilibria for a Selfish Routing Game. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, pp. 123–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B., Spirakis, P.: Extreme Nash Equilibria, March 2003, submitted for publication. Also available as Technical Report FLAGS-TR-02-5, Computer Technology Institute, Patras, Greece (November 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez, T., Ibarra, O.H., Sahni, S.: Bounds for LPT schedules on uniform processors. SIAM Journal on Computing 6(1), 155–166 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Graham, R.L.: Bounds on Multiprocessing Timing Anomalies. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 17, 416–426 (1969)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Horowitz, E., Sahni, S.: Exact and aproximate algorithms for scheduling nonidentical processors. Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery 23(2), 317–327 (1976)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Koutsoupias, E., Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: Approximate Equilibria and Ball Fusion. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity (2002); accepted to Theory of Computing Systems

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Worst-case Equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: The Price of Selfish Routing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 510–519 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moulin, H., Vial, L.: Strategically Zero-Sum Games: The Class of Games whose Completely Mixed Equilibria Cannot be Improved Upon. International Journal of Game Theory 7(3/4), 201–221 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Nash, J.F.: Non-cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 286–295 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Algorithms, Games and the Internet. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 749–753 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raghavan, T.E.S.: Completely Mixed Strategies in Bimatrix Games. Journal of London Mathematical Society 2(2), 709–712 (1970)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B., Rode, M., Spirakis, P., Vrto, I. (2003). Which Is the Worst-Case Nash Equilibrium?. In: Rovan, B., Vojtáš, P. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2003. MFCS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2747. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45138-9_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45138-9_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45138-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics