Skip to main content

Revisiting the Foundations of Artificial Immune Systems: A Problem-Oriented Perspective

  • Conference paper
Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2787))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Since their development, AIS have been used for a number of machine learning tasks including that of classification. Within the literature, there appears to be a lack of appreciation for the possible bias in the selection of various representations and affinity measures that may be introduced when employing AIS in classification tasks. Problems are then compounded when inductive bias of algorithms are not taken into account when applying seemingly generic AIS algorithms to specific application domains. This paper is an attempt at highlighting some of these issues. Using the example of classification, this paper explains the potential pitfalls in representation selection and the use of various affinity measures. Additionally, attention is given to the use of negative selection in classification and it is argued that this may be not an appropriate algorithm for such a task. This paper then presents ideas on avoiding unnecessary mistakes in the choice and design of AIS algorithms and ultimately delivered solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aha, D.W.: Artificial Intelligence Review – special issue on lazy learning, June 1997, vol. 11(1-5) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anchor, K.P., Williams, P.D., Gunsch, G.H., Lamont, G.B.: The computer defense immune system: current and future research in intrusion detection. In: Proc. Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2002), IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balthrop, J., Esponda, F., Forrest, S., Glickman, M.: Coverage and generalization in an artificial immune system. In: Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf. (GECCO- 2002), pp. 3–10. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dasgupta, D., Majumdar, N.S.: Anomaly detection in multidimensional data using negative selection algorithm. In: Proc. Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2002), pp. 1039–1044. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. de Castro, L.N., Timmis, J.: Artificial Immune Systems: a new computational intelligence approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrest, S., Perelson, A.S., Allen, L., Cherukuri, R.: Self-nonself discrimination in a computer. In: Proc. IEEE Symp. On Research in Security and Privacy, pp. 202–212 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freitas, A.A.: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery with Evolutionary Algorithms. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzalez, F.A., Dasgupta, D.: An immunogenetic technique to detect anomalies in network traffic. In: Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf. (GECCO-2002), pp. 1081–1088. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofmeyr, S.A., Forrest, S.: Immunity by design: an artificial immune system. In: Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf. (GECCO-1999), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, J., Bentley, P.J.: Towards an artificial immune system for network intrusion detection: an investigation of dynamic clonal selection. In: Proc. Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2002), IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liao, T.W., Zhang, Z., Mount, C.R.: Similarity measures for retrieval in case-based reasoning systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence 12, 267–288 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Michalski, R.W.: A theory and methodology of inductive learning. Artificial Intelligence 20, 111–161 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Taylor, C.C.: Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification. Ellis Horwood, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell, T.M.: The need for biases in learning generalizations. Rutgers Technical Report (1980); Also published in: J.W. Shavlik and T.G. Dietterich (Eds.) Readings in Machine Learning, 184-191. Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Quinlan, J.R., Cameron-Jones, R.: Oversearching and layered search in empirical learning. In: Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pp. 1019–1024. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rao, R.B., Gordon, D., Spears, W.: For every generalization action, is there really an equal and opposite reaction? Analysis of the conservation law for generalization performance. In: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 471–479. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schaffer, C.: A conservation law for generalization performance. In: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 259–265. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, S.: Anomaly detection using negative selection based on the r-contiguous matching rule. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS-2002), University of Kent at Canterbury, UK, September 2002, pp. 99–106 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stanfill, G., Waltz, D.: Towards memory-based reasoning. Communications of the ACM 29(12), 1213–1228 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watkins, A.B., Boggess, L.: A resource limited artificial immune system classifier. In: Proc. Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2002), IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watkins, A., Timmis, J.: Artificial Immune Recognition System (AIRS): revisions and refinements. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS-2002), University of Kent at Canterbury, UK, September 2002, pp. 173–181 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freitas, A.A., Timmis, J. (2003). Revisiting the Foundations of Artificial Immune Systems: A Problem-Oriented Perspective. In: Timmis, J., Bentley, P.J., Hart, E. (eds) Artificial Immune Systems. ICARIS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2787. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45192-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45192-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40766-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45192-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics