Skip to main content

Dynamic versus Static Student Models Based on Bayesian Networks: An Empirical Study

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2003)

Abstract

In this paper, we present an empirical study with simulated students that allows to compare the accuracy of two models based on Bayesian networks in the context of student modelling: a dynamic model versus an static model. The results show that the performance of both models is very similar, being the dynamic much faster and easier to implement. A second study evaluates the use of adaptive item selection criteria, that can provide an increase on accuracy and a big reduction in test length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barco, R., Guerrero, R., Hylander, G., Nielsen, L., Partanen, M., Patel, S.: Automated Troubleshooting of Mobile Networks using Bayesian Networks. In: Proceedings of IASTED 2002, pp. 105–110. Acta Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom, B.: The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 4–15 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, J.A., Greer, J.E., Huang, S.H.: Adaptive Assessment Using Granularity Hierarchies and Bayesian Nets. In: Lesgold, A.M., Frasson, C., Gauthier, G. (eds.) ITS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1086. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conati, C., Gertner, A., Vanlehn, K.: Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4), 371–417 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Díez, F.J.: Sistema experto bayesiano para ecocardiografía. Doctoral dissertation, UNED, Madrid (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henze, N., Nedjl, W.: Student Modeling for the KBS Hyperbook System using Bayesian Networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Education AIED 1999 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., Rommelse, K.: The Lumière Project: Bayesian User Modelling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence UAI 1998, pp. 256–265. Morgan Kauffman Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayo, M.: Bayesian Student Modelling and Decision-Theoretic Selection of Tutorial Actions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayo, M., Mitrovic, A.: Using a Probabilistic Student Model to Control Problem Difficulty. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 525–533. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Millán, E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.L.: A Bayesian Diagnostic Algorithm for Student Modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(2), 281–330 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L., Almond, R.: On the Role of Task Model Variables in Assessment Design. Center of the Study of Evaluation (CSE) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reye, J.: Two-phase Updating of Student Models Based on Dynamic Belief Networks. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds.) ITS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1452, pp. 6–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Linden, W., Hambleton, R. (eds.): Handbook of Modern Ite Response Theory. Springer, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Villano, M.: Probabilistic Student Models: Bayesian Belief Networks and Knowledge Space Theory. In: Frasson, C., McCalla, G.I., Gauthier, G. (eds.) ITS 1992. LNCS, vol. 608. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vomlel, J.: Bayesian Networks in Educational Testing. In: Proceedings of 1st European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, pp. 176–185 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wainer, H. (ed.): Computerized Adaptive Testing: a Primer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.: SModel Server: Student Modelling in Distributed Multi-Agent Tutoring Systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Education AIED 1999. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Millán, E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.L., García, F. (2003). Dynamic versus Static Student Models Based on Bayesian Networks: An Empirical Study. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2774. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45226-3_181

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45226-3_181

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40804-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45226-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics