Skip to main content

Improving the Quality of Entity Relationship Models—Experience in Research and Practice

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling – ER ’98 (ER 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1507))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper is an extension of previous research which developed a framework for evaluating and improving the quality of Entity Relationship models. The framework has now been used extensively in research and practice, including application in two of the largest commercial organisations in Australia. The experiences gained have been used to further develop and refine the framework. This paper describes how the framework has been used to: (a) quality assure data models as part of application development projects (product quality); (b) reengineer application development procedures to build quality into the data modelling process (process quality); (c) provide automated support for the evaluation process (Data Model Quality Advisor); (d) investigate the differences between data models produced by expert and novice data modellers. The results show that use of the framework has the potential to significantly improve research, practice and teaching of data modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Hamid, T.K.: The Economics of Software Quality Assurance: A Simulation Based Study. MIS Quarterly 12(3) (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Software Metrics Association (ASMA), ASMA Project Database, Release 7, November, P.O. Box 1287, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia, 3128 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avison, D.: Action Programmes for Teaching and Researching in Information Systems. Australian Computer Journal 23(2), 66–72 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Batini, C., Ceri, S., Navathe, S.B.: Conceptual Database Design: An Entity Relationship Approach. Benjamin Cummings, Redwood City (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Batra, D., Davis, J.: Conceptual Data Modelling in Database Design: Similarities and Differences between Expert and Novice Designers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 37, 83–101 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batra, D., Hoffer, J.A., Bostrom, R.P.: Comparing Representations with Relational and EER Models. Communications of the ACM 33(2), 126–139 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 11(3), 369–386 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bubenko, J.A.: Information Systems Methodologies: A Research View. In: Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A. (eds.) Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice, pp. 289–318. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Checkland, P.B., Scholes, J.: Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davenport, T.H.: Saving IT’s Soul: Human Centred Information Management, Harvard Business Review (March-April 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gable, G.: Consultant Engagement Success: Client versus Consultant Views. In: Proc. 7th Australian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 253–263 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gartner Research Group: Sometimes You Gotta Break the Rules, Gartner Group Strategic Management Series Key Issues, 23 (November 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horrocks, B., Moss, J.: Practical Data Administration. BCS Practitioner Series. Prentice Hall International, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. International Standards Organisation (ISO), Information Processing Systems - Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base, ISO Technical Report 9007 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ivari, J.: Dimensions Of Information Systems Design: A Framework For A Long Range Research Program. Information Systems, 39–42 (June 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kesh, S.: Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. Information and Software Technology 37(12) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, Y.-G., March, S.T.: Comparing Data Modelling Formalisms. Communications of the ACM 38(6), 103–113 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krogstie, J., Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G.: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Quality in Requirements Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 7th nternational Conference on Advanced Information Systems Egineering (CAISE), Jyvaskyla, Finland, (June 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levitin, A., Redman, T.: Quality Dimensions of a Conceptual View. Information Processing and Management 31(1), 81–88 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Solveberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modelling. IEEE Software, 42–49 (March 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maiden, N., Sutcliffe, A.: Analysing the Novice Analyst: Cognitive Models in Software Engineering. Intl. Journal Man Machine Studies 36(7), 719–740 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, J.: Strategic Data Planning Methodologies. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moody, D.L.: Critical Success Factors for Information Resource Management. In: Proc. 7th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Hobart, Australia (December 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moody, D.L.: Metrics for evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds.) ER 1998. LNCS, vol. 1507, pp. 211–225. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: What Makes A Good Data Model? Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. In: Loucopoulos, P. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on the Entity Relationship Approach, Manchester, December 14-17, pp. 94–111 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: What Makes A Good Data Model? A Framework for Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. Australian Computer Journal, forthcoming (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moody, D.L., Simsion, G.C.: Justifying Investment in Information Resource Management. Australian Journal of Information Systems 3(1), 25–37 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rescher, N.: Methodological Pragmatism: Systems-Theoretic Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. New York University Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ross, R.G.: The Business Rule Book, Database Research Group, 2nd edn., Boston, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shanks, G.: Conceptual Data Modelling: An Empirical Study of Expert and Novice Data Modellers. Australian Journal of Information Systems 4(2), 63–73 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shanks, G., Darke, P.: Quality in Conceptual Modelling: Linking Theory and Practice. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology, pp. 805–814 (May 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shoval, P., Even-Chaime, M.: Database Schema Design: An Experimental Comparison Between Normalisation and Information Analysis. Database 18(3), 30–39 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Simsion, G.C.: Data Modelling Essentials, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  36. van Vliet, J.C.: Software Engineering: Principles and Practice. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  37. von Halle, B.: Data: Asset or Liability? Database Programming and Design 4(7), 13–15 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  38. von Halle, B., Conkey, J.: Rewiring the Business. Database Programming and Design 10(1), 11–15 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Walrad, C., Moss, E.: Measurement: The Key to Application Development Quality. IBM Systems Journal 32(3), 445–460 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zultner, R.E.: The Deming Way: Total Quality Management for Software. In: Proceedings of Total Quality Management (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G., Darke, P. (1998). Improving the Quality of Entity Relationship Models—Experience in Research and Practice. In: Ling, TW., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds) Conceptual Modeling – ER ’98. ER 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1507. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49524-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49524-6_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65189-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49524-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics