Skip to main content

A Declarative Language for the Coq Proof Assistant

  • Conference paper
Book cover Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4941))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a new proof language for the Coq proof assistant. This language uses the declarative style. It aims at providing a simple, natural and robust alternative to the existing \(\mathcal{L}_{tac}\) tactic language. We give the syntax of our language, an informal description of its commands and its operational semantics. We explain how this language can be used to implement formal proof sketches. Finally, we present some extra features we wish to implement in the future.

This work was partially funded by NWO Bricks/Focus Project 642.000.501.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coen, C.S.: Automatic generation of declarative scripts. CHAT: Connecting Humans and Type Checkers (December 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Coq Development Team. The Coq Proof Assistant Reference Manual – Version V8.1 (February 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corbineau, P.: First-order reasoning in the calculus of inductive constructions. In: Berardi, S., Coppo, M., Damiani, F. (eds.) TYPES 2003. LNCS, vol. 3085, pp. 162–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corbineau, P.: Deciding equality in the constructor theory. In: Altenkirch, T., McBride, C. (eds.) TYPES 2006. LNCS, vol. 4502, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Corbineau, P., Kaliszyk, C.: Cooperative repositories for formal proofs. In: Kauers, M., Kerber, M., Miner, R., Windsteiger, W. (eds.) MKM/CALCULEMUS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4573, pp. 221–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Giero, M., Wiedijk, F.: MMode, a mizar mode for the proof assistant coq. Technical report, ICIS, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon, M., Milner, R., Wadsworth, C.: Edinburgh LCF. LNCS, vol. 78. Springer, Heidelberg (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrison, J.: A mizar mode for HOL. In: von Wright, J., Harrison, J., Grundy, J. (eds.) TPHOLs 1996. LNCS, vol. 1125, pp. 203–220. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison, J.: The HOL Light manual, Version 2.20 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lamport, L.: How to write a proof. American Mathematics Monthly 102(7), 600–608 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Paulson, L.: Isabelle. LNCS, vol. 828. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Syme, D.: DECLARE: A prototype declarative proof system for higher order logic. Technical report, University of Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Syme, D.: Three tactic theorem proving. In: Bertot, Y., Dowek, G., Hirschowitz, A., Paulin, C., Théry, L. (eds.) TPHOLs 1999. LNCS, vol. 1690, pp. 203–220. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Wenzel, M.: Isar - A generic interpretative approach to readable formal proof documents. In: Bertot, Y., Dowek, G., Hirschowitz, A., Paulin, C., Théry, L. (eds.) TPHOLs 1999. LNCS, vol. 1690, pp. 167–184. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wenzel, M., Wiedijk, F.: A comparison of Mizar and Isar. Journal of Automated Reasoning 29(3-4), 389–411 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiedijk, F.: Mizar light for HOL light. In: Boulton, R.J., Jackson, P.B. (eds.) TPHOLs 2001. LNCS, vol. 2152, pp. 378–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiedijk, F.: Formal proof sketches. In: Berardi, S., Coppo, M., Damiani, F. (eds.) TYPES 2003. LNCS, vol. 3085, pp. 378–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marino Miculan Ivan Scagnetto Furio Honsell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Corbineau, P. (2008). A Declarative Language for the Coq Proof Assistant. In: Miculan, M., Scagnetto, I., Honsell, F. (eds) Types for Proofs and Programs. TYPES 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4941. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68103-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68103-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68084-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68103-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics