Skip to main content

The Application of the Concept of Indicative Neighbourhood on Landsat ETM + Images and Orthophotos Using Circular and Annulus Kernels

  • Conference paper
Headway in Spatial Data Handling

Abstract

We calculated the mean and standard deviation from Landsat ETM+ red and panchromatic channels, and from red tone and lightness values of orthophotos within several kernel radii, in order to recognize three different variables: multinomial—forest stand type (deciduous, coniferous, mixed), numerical—forest stand coverage, binomial—the presence/absence of orchid species Epipactis palustris. Case-based iterative weighting of observations and their features in the software system Constud was used. Goodness-of-fit of predictions was estimated using leave-one-out cross validation. Cohen’s kappa index of agreement was applied to nominal variables, and RMSE was used for stand coverage. The novel aspect is the inclusion of additional information from particular neighbourhood zones (indicative neighbourhood) using annulus kernels, and combining those with focal circular ones. The characteristics of neighbourhood in conjunction with local image pattern enabled more accurate estimations than the application of a single kernel. The best combinations most often contained a 10ldots25 m radius focal kernel and an annulus kernel having internal and external radii ranging from 25 to 200 m. The optimal radii applied on the Landsat image were usually larger than those for the orthophotos. The optimal kernel size did not depend on either reflectance band or target variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aha DW (1998) The omnipresence of case-based reasoning in science and application. Knowledge-Based Systems 11:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Lewis P (2000) Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: An introduction. Computers & Geosciences 26:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chica-Olmo M, Abarca-Hernandez F (2000) Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification. Computers & Geosciences 26:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coops N, Culvenor D (2000) Utilizing local variance of simulated high spatial resolution imagery to predict spatial pattern of forest stands. Remote Sensing of Environment 71:248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillworth ME, Whistler JL, Merchant JW (1994) Measuring landscape structure using geographic and geometric windows. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 60:1215–1224

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin SE, Hall RJ, Moskal LM, Maudie AJ, Lavigne MB (2000) Incorporating texture into classification of forest species composition from airborne multispectral images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21(1):61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin SE, Wulder, MA, Lavigne MB (1996) Automated derivation of geographic window sizes for use in remote sensing digital image texture analysis. Computers & Geosciences 22(6):665–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-3(6):610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Collet C (1999) Combining spectral and textural features for multispectral image classification with Artificial Neural Networks. International Archives of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 32(7-4-3 W6), Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June 1999:175-181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson ME (1998) What size window for image classification? A cognitive perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 64(8):797–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu S (1978) Texture-tone analysis for automated land-use mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 44(11):1393–1404

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayitakire F, Hamel C, Defourny P (2006) Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 102:390–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM (1996) Geostatistical description of texture on an aerial photograph for discriminating classes of land cover. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17(11):2115–2133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent EJ, Shia H, Gatziolis D, LeBoutonc JP, Walters MB, Liu J (2005) Using the spatial and spectral precision of satellite imagery to predict wildlife occurrence patterns. Remote Sensing of Environment 97:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mökelö H, Pekkarinen A (2001) Estimation of timber volume at the sample plot level by means of image segmentation and Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 77:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park Y-J, Kim B-C, Chun S-H (2006) New knowledge extraction technique using probability for case-based reasoning: application to medical diagnosis. Expert Systems 23(1):2–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remm K (2004) Case-based predictions for species and habitat mapping. Ecological Modelling 177:259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remm K (2005) Correlations between forest stand diversity and landscape pattern in Otepöö NP, Estonia. Journal for Nature Conservation 13(2-3):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remm K, Luud A (2003) Regression and point pattern models of moose distribution in relation to habitat distribution and human influence in Ida-Viru county, Estonia. Journal for Nature Conservation 11:197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Corona P, Marchetti M, Chirici G, Innamorati S (2003) LaDy: software for assessing local landscape diversity profiles of raster land cover maps using geographic windows. Environmental Modelling & Software 18:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock CE, Strahler AH (1987) The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing the Environment 21:311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Q, Gong P, Clinton N, Biging G, Kelly M, Schirokauer D (2006) Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 72(7):799–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawadzki J, Cieszewski CJ, Zasada M, Lowe RC (2005) Applying geostatistics for investigations of forest ecosystems using remote sensing imagery. Silva Fennica 39(4):599–617

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Linder, M., Remm, K., Proosa, H. (2008). The Application of the Concept of Indicative Neighbourhood on Landsat ETM + Images and Orthophotos Using Circular and Annulus Kernels. In: Ruas, A., Gold, C. (eds) Headway in Spatial Data Handling. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68566-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics