Skip to main content

A Model for Evaluating the Quality of User-Created Documents

  • Conference paper
Information Retrieval Technology (AIRS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4993))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a model for evaluating the quality of general user-created documents. The model is based on supervised classification approach, in which output scores are considered as quality of given document. In order to utilize both textual and non-textual attributes of documents, we incorporated a number of objectively measurable, real-valued features selected upon predefined criteria for quality. Experiments on two datasets of real world documents show that textual features are stable indicators for evaluating documents’ quality. Some features are inferred to be effective for general kinds of documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jeon, J., Croft, W.B., Lee, J.H., Park, S.: A Framework to Predict The Quality of Answers with Non-textual Features. In: SIGIR, pp. 228–235 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Identifying Comparative Sentences in Text Documents. In: SIGIR, pp. 244–251 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, S.M., Pantel, P., Chklovski, T., Pennacchiotti, M.: Automatically Assessing Review Helpfulness. In: EMNLP, pp. 423–430 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, J., Cao, Y., Lin, C.Y., Huang, Y., Zhou, M.: Low-Quality Product Review Detection in Opinion Summarization. In: EMNLP-CoNLL, pp. 334–342 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malouf, R.: A Comparison of Algorithms for Maximum Entropy Parameter Estimation. In: CoNLL, pp. 49–55 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Page, E.: Computer Grading of Student Prose. JEE 62(2), 127–142 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Park, S., Lee, J.H., Jeon, J.: Evaluation of The Documents from The Web-based Question and Answer Service. Journal of KSLIS, 299–314 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Riloff, E., Wiebe, J.: Learning Extraction Patterns for Subjective Expression. In: EMNLP, pp. 105–112 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hang Li Ting Liu Wei-Ying Ma Tetsuya Sakai Kam-Fai Wong Guodong Zhou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoang, L., Lee, JT., Song, YI., Rim, HC. (2008). A Model for Evaluating the Quality of User-Created Documents. In: Li, H., Liu, T., Ma, WY., Sakai, T., Wong, KF., Zhou, G. (eds) Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4993. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68636-1_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68636-1_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68633-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68636-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics