Skip to main content

Classification and Quantification Based on Image Analysis for Sperm Samples with Uncertain Damaged/Intact Cell Proportions

  • Conference paper
Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5112))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Classifying damaged-intact cells in a semen sample presents the peculiarity that the test class distribution is unknown. This paper studies under which design conditions the misclassification rate is minimum for the uncertainty region of interest (ratio of damaged cells lower than 20%) and (b) deals with quantifying the proportion of damaged/intact sperm cells in a given sample based on computer vision and supervised learning. We have applied a discrete wavelet transform to the spermatozoa head images and computed the mean and standard deviation (WSF) and four Haralick descriptors (WCF). Using a backpropagation neural network, the error rate averaged over distributions in the region of interest is 4.85% with WCF. The assessment of several quantification methods shows the conditions under which the Adjusted Count method leads to an overall mean absolute error of 3.2 and the Classify & Count method yields 2.4, both with WCF features. Deviations of this order are considered reasonable for this field.

This work has been partially supported by the research project DPI2006-02550 from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alaiz-Rodríguez, R., Guerrero-Curieses, A., Cid-Sueiro, J.: Minimax regret classifier for imprecise class distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research 8, 103–130 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drummond, C., Holte, R.C.: Cost curves: An improved method for visualizing classifier performance. Machine Learning 65(1), 95–130 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Forman, G.: Counting Positives Accurately Despite Inaccurate Classification. In: Gama, J., Camacho, R., Brazdil, P.B., Jorge, A.M., Torgo, L. (eds.) ECML 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3720, pp. 564–575. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Forman, G.: Quantifying trends accurately despite classifier error and class imbalance. In: KDD 2006: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 157–166. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. González, M., Alegre, E., Alaiz, R., Sánchez, L.: Acrosome integrity classification of boar spermatozoon images using dwt and texture techniques. In: VipIMAGE - Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing, pp. 165–168. Taylor & Francis, Abington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haralick, R.M.: Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceedings of the IEEE 67(5), 786–804 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Linneberg, C., Salamon, P., Svarer, C., Hansen, L.K.: Towards semen quality assessment using neural networks. In: Proc. IEEE Neural Networks for Signal Processing IV, pp. 509–517. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Petkov, N., Alegre, E., Biehl, M., Sánchez, L.: LVQ acrosome integrity assessment of boar sperm cells. In: Tavares, J.M.R.S., Natal Jorge, R.M. (eds.) COMPImage - Computational Modelling of Objects Represented in Images, pp. 337–342. Taylor and Francis Group, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saerens, M., Latinne, P., Decaestecker, C.: Adjusting a classifier for new a priori probabilities: A simple procedure. Neural Computation 14, 21–41 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Samper, J.C.: Equine Breeding and Management and Artificial Insemination. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanchez, L., Petkov, N., Alegre, E.: Statistical approach to boar semen evaluation using intracellular intensity distribution of head images. Cellular and Molecular Biology 52(6), 38–43 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arivazhagan, S., Ganesan, L.: Texture classification using wavelet transform. Pattern Recognition Letters 24(9-10), 1513–1521 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Suarez, S., Alegre, E., Castejón, M., Sánchez, L.: Use of statistic texture descriptors to classify boar sperm images applying discriminant analysis. In: VipIMAGE -Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing, pp. 197–201. Taylor & Francis, Abington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Verstegen, J., Iguer-Ouada, M., Onclin, K.: Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57(1), 149–179 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Aurélio Campilho Mohamed Kamel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sánchez, L., González, V., Alegre, E., Alaiz, R. (2008). Classification and Quantification Based on Image Analysis for Sperm Samples with Uncertain Damaged/Intact Cell Proportions. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M. (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69812-8_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69812-8_82

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69811-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69812-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics