Skip to main content

Formula-Dependent Abstraction for CTL Model Checking

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2008 (ICCSA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5073))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1562 Accesses

Abstract

We present a state abstraction that is defined with respect to a given CTL formula. Since it does not attempt to preserve all ACTL formula, like simulation does, we can expect to compute coarser abstraction. Specifically, the abstraction is used to reduce the size of each Kripke structure, so that their product will be smaller. When the abstraction is too coarse, we show how refinement can be applied to produce a more precise abstract model. We also extend the notion of formula-dependent abstraction to Kripke structure with fairness, and define the coarsest abstraction that preserves the given CTL formula interpreted with respect to the fair paths. The method is exact and fully automatic, and handles full CTL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke, E.M., Burch, J.R., Grumberg, O., Long, D.E., McMillan, K.L.: Automatic Verification of Sequential Circuit Designs. Phil. Trans. of the Royal Society of London 339, 105–120 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Emerson, E.A.: Temporal and Model Logic. Formal Models and Semantics. Handbook of theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 996–1072 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Synthesis of Synchronization Skeletons for Branching Time Temporal Logic. In: Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Graf, S., Saidi, H.: Construction of Abstract State Graphs with PVS. In: Proceedings of Computer Aided Verification. LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract Interpretation: a Unified Lattice Model for Static Analysis of Programs by Construction or Approximation of Fixpoints. In: Proceedings of POPL, pp. 238–252 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract Interpretation Frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 2(4), 511–547 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P.: Automatic Verfication of Finite-state Concurrent Systems Using Temporal Logic Specifications. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 8(2), 244–263 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided Abstraction Refinement. In: Proceedings of Computer Aided Verification, pp. 154–169 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alur, R., Itai, A., Kurshan, R.P., Yannakakis, M.: Timing Verification by Successive Approximation. Information and Computation 118(1), 142–157 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lakhnech, Y., Bensalem, S., Berezin, S., Owre, S.: Incremental Verification by Abstraction. In: Margaria, T., Yi, W. (eds.) ETAPS 2001 and TACAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2031, pp. 98–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Long, D.E.: Model Checking and Abstraction. In: Proceedings of TOPLAS, pp. 1512–1542 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aziz, A., Shiple, T.R., Singhal, V., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L.: Formula-dependent Equivalence for Compositional CTL Model Checking. In: Dill, D.L. (ed.) CAV 1994. LNCS, vol. 818, pp. 324–337. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dams, D., Gerth, R., Grumberg, O.: Generation of Reduced Models for Checking Fragments of CTL. In: Courcoubetis, C. (ed.) CAV 1993. LNCS, vol. 697, pp. 479–490. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dams, D., Gerth, R., Grumberg, O.: Abstract Interpretation of Reactive Systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 19(2), 253–291 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Loiseaux, C., Graf, S., Sifakis, J., Bouajjani, A., Bensalem, S.: Property Preserving Abstractions for the Verification of Concurrent Systems. Formal Methods in System Design 6(1), 11–44 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Dams, D., Gerth, R., Grumberg, O.: Fair model Checking of Abstractions (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of VCL, number DSSE-TR-2000-6, University of Southampton (July 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aziz, A., Singhal, V., Shiple, T.R., SangiovanniVincentelli, A.L., Balarin, F., Brayton, R.K.: Equivalences for Fair Kripke Structures. In: Shamir, E., Abiteboul, S. (eds.) ICALP 1994. LNCS, vol. 820, pp. 364–375. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bensalem, S., Lakhnech, Y., Owre, S.: Computing Abstractions of Infinite State Systems Compositionally and Automatically. In: Proceedings of Computer Aided Verification. LNCS, vol. 1427, pp. 319–331 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Giacobazzi, R., Ranzato, F.: Incompleteness, Counterexamples and Refinements in Abstract Model Checking. In: Cousot, P. (ed.) SAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2126, pp. 356–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Ranzato, F., Tapparo, F.: Strong Preservation as Completeness in Abstract Interpretation. In: Schmidt, D. (ed.) ESOP 2004. LNCS, vol. 2986, pp. 18–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ranzato, F., Tapparo, F.: Strong Preservation of Temporal Fixpoint-based Operators by Abstract Interpretation. In: Emerson, E.A., Namjoshi, K.S. (eds.) VMCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 3855, pp. 332–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Corbett, J.C., Dwyer, M.B., Hatcliff, J., Laubach, S., Pasareanu, C.S., Robby., Zheng, H.: Bandera: Extracting Finite-state Models from Java Source Code. In: Proceedings of ICSE, pp. 439–448 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Havelund, K., Pressburger, T.: Model Checking JAVA Programs using JAVA PathFinder. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 2(4), 366–381 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ball, T., Majumdar, R., Millstein, T.D., Rajamani, S.K.: Automatic Predicate Abstraction of C Programs. In: SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 203–213 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chaki, S., Clarke, E.M., Groce, A., Ouaknine, J., Strichman, O., Yorav, K.: Efficient Verification of Sequential and Concurrent C Programs. Formal Methods in System Design 25(2-3), 129–166 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Henzinger, T.A., Jhala, R., Majumdar, R., Sutre, G.: Lazy Abstraction. In: Proceedings of POPL, pp. 58–70 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Osvaldo Gervasi Beniamino Murgante Antonio Laganà David Taniar Youngsong Mun Marina L. Gavrilova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qian, J., Zhao, L., Cai, G., Gu, T. (2008). Formula-Dependent Abstraction for CTL Model Checking. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Laganà, A., Taniar, D., Mun, Y., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2008. ICCSA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5073. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69848-7_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69848-7_82

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69840-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69848-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics