Skip to main content

Interlingua for French and German Topological Prepositions

  • Conference paper
Book cover Natural Language and Information Systems (NLDB 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5039))

  • 1362 Accesses

Abstract

The present study focuses on the definition of an Interlingua for the French topological prepositions dans(in) , sur(on) ”, “ à(at) and their equivalent in German in , auf , an with a view to their use in French-German machine translation and second language acquisition systems. Both languages have a concept of preposition but with a different lexical use. In the same spatial situation, not always equivalent prepositions are used. The French and German prepositions can cover the description of a certain spatial situation, although its meanings can overlap themselves only partially. The choice of the appropriate preposition in a target language depends on the meaning of the topological preposition. With the second language acquisition of spatial prepositions mistakes frequently occur, because one preposition in French does not correspond necessarily to a same basic meaning of a preposition in German. Regarding the machine translation of spatial prepositions, their meanings in a target language can not be defined in the same lexical way. Therefore the machine translation and the second language acquisition of spatial expressions must be occur not directly on a language dependent, i.e. linguistic, but on a language independent level, i.e. conceptual level. The definition of an Interlingua assumes that the meaning of French and German topological prepositions can be expressed in common neutral concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, A.: Lokalisierungsausdrücke im Sprachvergleich; eine lexikalischsemantische Analyse von Lokalisirieungsausdrücken im Deutschen, Englischen,Französischen und Türkischen. Niemeyer, Tübingen (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, D.C.: Spatial and Temporal Uses of English Prepositions: An Essay in Stratificational Semantics. Longman, London (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bierwisch, M.: Some Semantic Universals of German Adjectivals. Foundation of Language 3 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bierwisch, M., Schreuder, R.: From concepts to lexical items. In: Cognition, vol. 42, pp. 23–60 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, P.F.: A survey of category types in natural language. In: Tso´hatzidis, pp. 17–48 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buschbeck-Wolf, B.: Topologische Präpositionen und ihre Verarbeitung in der maschinellen Übersetzung. Dissertation am Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverabeitung der Universität Stuttgart (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Covey, E.S., Lattanzi, K.M.: “What” effects on “where”: Functional influences on spatial relations. Psychological Science 10, 516–521 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, H.H.: Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child. In: Moore, T.E. (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York, pp. 65–110. Academic Press, London (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn, A.G., Bennett, B., Gooday, J.M., Gotts, N.: RCC: a calculus for region based qualitative spatial reasoning. GeoInformatica 1, 275–316 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coventry, K.R., Carmichael, R., Garrod, S.C.: Spatial prepositions, object-specific function, and task requirements. Journal of Semantics 11, 289–309 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coventry, K.R.: Function, geometry, and spatial prepositions: Three experiments. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 145–154 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.A.: Saying, Seeing,and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of SpatialPrepositions. Psychology Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper, G.S.: A semantic analysis of English locative prepositions. Bolt Beranek and Newman report Nr. 1587, Springfield (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlgren, K.: Naive Semantics for Natural Language Understanding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Garrod, S., Ferrier, G., Campbell, S.: In and on: investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition 72, 167–189 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gentner, D., Imai, M., Borodisky, L.: As Time Goes By: Evidence for two systems in processing space>time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 17, 537–565 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grimaud, M.: Toponyns,Prepositions, and Cognitive Maps in English and French. Journal of the American Socieiy of Gcolinguistics 14, 54–76 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Habel, C.: Zwischen-Bericht. In: Christoph, Habel, Herweg, M., Rehkämper, K. (eds.) Raumkonzepte in Verstehensprozessen, pp. 37–69. Niemeyer, Tübingen (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herskovits, A.: Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Atudy of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herweg, M.: Ansätze zu einer semantischen Beschreibung topologischer Präpositionen. In: Christoph, Habel, Herweg, M., Rehkämper, K. (eds.) Raumkonzepte in Verstehensprozessen, pp. 99–127. Niemeyer, Tübingen (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hottenroth, P.M.: Präpositionen und Objektkonzepte. In: Rauh, G. (ed.) Approaches to prepositions. Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, vol. 358, pp. 77–108 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kiparsky, P.: Remarks on Denominal Verbs. In: Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., Sells, P. (eds.) Complex Predicates, pp. 473–499. CSLI, Stanford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klein, W.: Überall und nirgendwo. Subjektive und objektive Momente in der Raumreferenz. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 78, 9–42 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klein, W.: Raumausdrücke. Linguistische Berichte 132, 77–114 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we Live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lakoff, G.: Categories and Cognitive Models. Cognitive Science Program Series: University of California, Berkeley, L.A.U.T.-Paper, Nr.36, Series A (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lang, E.: A two level approch to projective prepositions. In: Rauh, G. (Hrsg). Approches to prepositions, pp. 127–167. Tübingen (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lang, E.: A two-level approach to projective prepositions. In: Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C. (ed.) The semantics of prepositions: from mental processing to Natural Language processing. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lang, E.: Spatial Dimension Terms. In: Haspelmath, M., et al. (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals, pp. 1251–1275. An International Handbook, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, J.: Räumliche Relationen und Objektwissen, am Beispiel an und bei. In: Studien zur deutschen Grammatik; Bd. 49, Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mark, D., Svorou, S., Zubin, D.: Spatial Terms and Spatial Concepts: Geographic, Cognitive, and Linguistic Perspectives. In: Proceedings of the International Geographic Information Systems (IGIS) Symposium: The Research Agenda, vol. 2 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miller, G., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Language and Perception. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Olsen, S.: Semantische und konzeptuelle Aspekte der Partikelverbbildung mit ein-. In: Olsen (ed.), pp. 9–26 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pribbenow, S.: Regebasierte Interpretation lokaler Präpositionen am Beispiel von in und bei. In: Habel, et al. (Hrsg). Raumkonzepte in Verstehensprozessen, Tübingen, pp. 202–228 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pribbenow, S.: Zur Verarbeitung von Lokalisierungsausdrücken in einem hybriden System. Dissertation am Fachbereich Informatik der Universität Hamburg. IBMS Report 211 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rosch, E.: Human Categorization. In: Waren, N. (ed.) Advances in Cross-Cultural psychology, vol. 1. Academic Press, London (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Talmy, L.: How Language Structures Space. In: Pick, H.L., Acredolo, L.P. (eds.) spatial Orientation, ch. 11. Plenum Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vandeloise, C.: L‘espace en français, Sémantique des Prépositions spatiales Ed. Seuil-Travaux en Linguistiques, Paris (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vandeloise, C.: Methodology and Analysis of the Preposition In. Cognitive Linguistics 5, 157–184 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vandeloise, C.: The Preposition in and the relationship container/contained. LAUD, Linguistic Agency of the University of Duisbung (prepublished, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wunderlich, D., Herweg, M.: Lokale und Direktionale. In: v. Stechow, A., Wunderlich, D. (eds.) Handbuch der Semantik, de Cruyter, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zusne, L.: Visual Perception of Form, New York, London (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Harwkins, B.: Semantics of English Spatial Prepositions.Ph.D. Thesis. San Diego, California: University of California. Thesis pre-published by L.A.U.D.T., Linguistic Agency of the University of Duisburg, previously Tier (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Epaminondas Kapetanios Vijayan Sugumaran Myra Spiliopoulou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aroui, D., Rahmouni, M.K. (2008). Interlingua for French and German Topological Prepositions. In: Kapetanios, E., Sugumaran, V., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds) Natural Language and Information Systems. NLDB 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5039. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69858-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69858-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69857-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69858-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics