Abstract
Since the 1960s qualitative problem structuring methods have evolved mainly in the UK from traditional operational research, which are called „soft OR“. These methods focus on generating understanding of systems as a whole, on improving systems, and on personal learning. System dynamics has similar goals; therefore, it might be useful to combine it with soft OR. Some examples of combinations exist; however, these are mainly anecdotal. Thus, systematic research promises new insights and knowledge about the useful combination of soft OR and system dynamics in practice and theory. This has often been asked for but has not yet been established. In this paper a characterization of system dynamics is presented that can be used to find potential combinations of system dynamics and soft OR. More precisely, a framework designed by [11] for mapping methods is described. This framework characterizes methods along two dimensions: four steps of intervention processes and three domains, in which problem situations manifest: social, personal, and material world. System dynamics is mapped and thus characterized by this framework. On the one hand, the mapping highlights the strengths of system dynamics; on the other hand, it shows possibilities for useful combinations with soft OR. With this study, further steps to a systematic research of combinations between system dynamics and soft OR are undertaken. Based on the method characterization of system dynamics and soft OR, proposals for concrete combinations can be derived and contextual factors for successful combinations can be investigated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackermann F, Eden C, Williams, T. (1997) Modeling for Litigation Interfaces 27(2):48–65.
Eden C. (1989) Using Cognitive Mapping for Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, ed. J. Rosenhead.
Forrester J.W (1994) System Dynamics, System Thinking, and Soft OR. System Dynamics Review 10(2):245–256.
Gardiner P.C, Ford A (1980) Which Policy Run Is Best?, And Who Says So? TIMS Studies in the Management Science 14: 241–257.
Habermans J (1984) Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. London.
Habermans J (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Oxford.
Kim D.H (1993) The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning. Sloan Management Review 35(1):37–15.
Lane D.C (1994) With a Little Help from Our Friends: How System Dynamics and Soft OR Can Learn from Each Other. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3):101–134.
Lane D.C, Oliva R (1994) The Greater Whole: Towards a synthesis of SD and SSM. Proceedings of the 1994 International System Dynamics Society
Mingers J (2000) Variety is the spice of life: Combining Soft and Hard OR/MS Methods International Transactions in Operational Research 7:673–691.
Mingers J (2001) Multimethodology-Mixing and Matching Methods. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J
Mingers J (1997) Multimethodology: Towards a Framework for Mixing Methodologies Omega 25(5) 489–509.
Munro I, Mingers J (2002) The use of multimethodology in practice-results of a survey of practitioners Journal of the Operational Research Society 53:369–378.
Pidd M (2004) Modelling-Theory and Practice. Chichester.
Reagan-Cirincione P, Schumann S, Richardson G.P, Dorf S.A (1991) Decision Modeling: Tools for Strategic Thinking Interfaces 21(6):52–65.
Rosenhead J (1996) What’s the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods Interfaces, 26(6):117–131.
Rosenhead J, Mingers J (2001) A New Paradigm of Analysis. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J.
Rouwette E, Größler A, Vennix J (2004) Exploring the Influencing Factors on Rationality: a Literature Review of Dynamic Decision-Making Studies in System Dynamics Systems Research & Behavioral Science 21(4):351–370.
Senge P (1994) The Fifth Discipline. New York.
Snabe B, Größler A (2006) System Dynamics Modeling for Strategy Implementation Systems Research & Behavioral Science 23(4): July/August 2006
Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics-Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stotz, M., Größler, A. (2007). Identifying Fruitful Combinations Between System Dynamics and Soft OR. In: Waldmann, KH., Stocker, U.M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2006. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_96
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_96
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69994-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69995-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)