Skip to main content

Identifying Fruitful Combinations Between System Dynamics and Soft OR

  • Conference paper
  • 2392 Accesses

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP,volume 2006))

Abstract

Since the 1960s qualitative problem structuring methods have evolved mainly in the UK from traditional operational research, which are called „soft OR“. These methods focus on generating understanding of systems as a whole, on improving systems, and on personal learning. System dynamics has similar goals; therefore, it might be useful to combine it with soft OR. Some examples of combinations exist; however, these are mainly anecdotal. Thus, systematic research promises new insights and knowledge about the useful combination of soft OR and system dynamics in practice and theory. This has often been asked for but has not yet been established. In this paper a characterization of system dynamics is presented that can be used to find potential combinations of system dynamics and soft OR. More precisely, a framework designed by [11] for mapping methods is described. This framework characterizes methods along two dimensions: four steps of intervention processes and three domains, in which problem situations manifest: social, personal, and material world. System dynamics is mapped and thus characterized by this framework. On the one hand, the mapping highlights the strengths of system dynamics; on the other hand, it shows possibilities for useful combinations with soft OR. With this study, further steps to a systematic research of combinations between system dynamics and soft OR are undertaken. Based on the method characterization of system dynamics and soft OR, proposals for concrete combinations can be derived and contextual factors for successful combinations can be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackermann F, Eden C, Williams, T. (1997) Modeling for Litigation Interfaces 27(2):48–65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eden C. (1989) Using Cognitive Mapping for Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, ed. J. Rosenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Forrester J.W (1994) System Dynamics, System Thinking, and Soft OR. System Dynamics Review 10(2):245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardiner P.C, Ford A (1980) Which Policy Run Is Best?, And Who Says So? TIMS Studies in the Management Science 14: 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Habermans J (1984) Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Habermans J (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim D.H (1993) The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning. Sloan Management Review 35(1):37–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lane D.C (1994) With a Little Help from Our Friends: How System Dynamics and Soft OR Can Learn from Each Other. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3):101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lane D.C, Oliva R (1994) The Greater Whole: Towards a synthesis of SD and SSM. Proceedings of the 1994 International System Dynamics Society

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mingers J (2000) Variety is the spice of life: Combining Soft and Hard OR/MS Methods International Transactions in Operational Research 7:673–691.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mingers J (2001) Multimethodology-Mixing and Matching Methods. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mingers J (1997) Multimethodology: Towards a Framework for Mixing Methodologies Omega 25(5) 489–509.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Munro I, Mingers J (2002) The use of multimethodology in practice-results of a survey of practitioners Journal of the Operational Research Society 53:369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pidd M (2004) Modelling-Theory and Practice. Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reagan-Cirincione P, Schumann S, Richardson G.P, Dorf S.A (1991) Decision Modeling: Tools for Strategic Thinking Interfaces 21(6):52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenhead J (1996) What’s the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods Interfaces, 26(6):117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenhead J, Mingers J (2001) A New Paradigm of Analysis. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rouwette E, Größler A, Vennix J (2004) Exploring the Influencing Factors on Rationality: a Literature Review of Dynamic Decision-Making Studies in System Dynamics Systems Research & Behavioral Science 21(4):351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Senge P (1994) The Fifth Discipline. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Snabe B, Größler A (2006) System Dynamics Modeling for Strategy Implementation Systems Research & Behavioral Science 23(4): July/August 2006

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics-Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stotz, M., Größler, A. (2007). Identifying Fruitful Combinations Between System Dynamics and Soft OR. In: Waldmann, KH., Stocker, U.M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2006. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_96

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics