Skip to main content

Cluster Quality Indexes for Symbolic Classification — An Examination

  • Conference paper
Advances in Data Analysis

Abstract

The paper presents difficulties of measuring clustering quality for symbolic data (such as lack of a “traditional” data matrix). Some hints concerning the usage of known indexes for such kind of data are given and indexes designed exclusively for symbolic data are described. Finally, after the presentation of simulation results, some proposals for choosing the most adequate indexes for popular classification algorithms are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BAKER, F.B. and HUBERT, L.J. (1975): Measuring the Power of Hierarchical Cluster Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70,349, 31–38.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • BALL, F.B. and HALL, D.J. (1965): ISODATA, A Novel Method of Data Analysis and Pattern Classification. Tech. Rep. NTIS No.AD 699616, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOCK, H.-H. and DIDAY, E. (2000): Analysis of Symbolic Data. Explanatory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALIŃSKI, R.B. and HARABASZ, J. (1974): A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis. Communications in Statistics, 3, 1–27.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • CHAVENT, M., DE CARVALHO, F.A.T., VERDE, R. and LECHEVALLIER, Y. (2003): Trois Nouvelle Méthodes de Classification Automatique de Données Symboliques de Type Intervalle. Revue de Statistique Appliquée, LI 4, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIDAY, E. (2002): An Introduction to Symbolic Data Analysis and the SODAS Software. J.S.D.A., International EJournal.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRIEDMAN, H.P. and RUBIN, J. (1967): On Some Invariant Criteria for Grouping Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1159–1178.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, A.D. (1999): Classification, Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HARDY, A. (2005): Validation of Unsupervised Symbolic Classification. Proceedings of ASMDA 2005 Conference. Available at URL: http://asmda2005.enst-bretagne.fr/IMG/pdf/proceedings/379.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTIGAN, J.A. (1975): Clustering Algorithms. New York, Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HUBERT, L.J. (1974): Approximate Evaluation Technique for the Single-link and Complete-link Hierarchical Clustering Procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69,347, 698–704.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HUBERT, L.J. and LEVINE, J.R. (1976): Evaluating Object Set Partitions: Free Sort Analysis and Some Generalizations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 15, 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAUFMAN, L. and ROUSSEEUW, P.J. (1990): Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KRZANOWSKI, W.J. and LAI, Y.T. (1988): A Criterion for Determining the Number of Groups in a Data Set Using Sum of Squares Clustering. Biometrics, 44, 23–34.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MARRIOT, F.H. (1971). Practical Problems in a Method of Cluster Analysis. Biometrics, 27, 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCQUITTY, L.L. (1966): Similarity Analysis by Reciprocal Pairs for Discrete and Continuous Data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 26, 825–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLIGAN, G.W. and COOPER, M.C. (1985): An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Psychometrika, 2, 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RATKOVSKI, D.A. and LANCE, G.N. (1978) A Criterion for Determining a Number of Groups in a Classification. Australian Computer Journal, 10, 115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROUSSEEUW, P.J. (1987): Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • SCOTT, A.J. and SYMONS, M.J. (1971) Clustering Methods Based on Likelihood Ratio Criteria. Biometrics, 27, 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VERDE, R. (2004): Clustering Methods in Symbolic Data Analysis. In: D. Banks et al. (Eds.): Classification, Clustering and Data Mining Applications, Springer, Berlin, 299–318.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • WEINGESSEL, A., DIMITRIADOU, A. and DOLNICAR, S. (1999): An Examination Of Indexes For Determining The Number Of Clusters In Binary Data Sets. Available at URL: http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/am/wp99.htm#29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dudek, A. (2007). Cluster Quality Indexes for Symbolic Classification — An Examination. In: Decker, R., Lenz, H.J. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics