Abstract
In a questionnaire study the effects of discourse structural information on resolving inter-sentential anaphora were investigated. The Right Frontier Constraint, first proposed by Polanyi (1988), states that potential antecedents of an anaphor that are placed at the right frontier of a discourse unit can be accessed more easily than antecedents that are placed somewhere else. Participants (N=36) received written experimental passages of six lines each that contained a pronominal anaphor in the last line and two potential antecedents in the preceding text, one introduced in the first, one in the fourth line of a passage. Antecedents’ relative position to the right frontier was manipulated through the discourse relation between the first and the second antecedent and through the filler information interposed between the second antecedent and the anaphor. The two potential antecedents either had the same or different grammatical gender. In the latter case only the first antecedent was gender congruent to the anaphor. Participants’ task was to name the anaphor’s antecedent. Results show that in case of unequal gender antecedents, participants almost always chose the gender congruent first antecedent, irrespective of its position relative to the Right Frontier. In case of equal gender antecedents choice patterns point to an influence of an antecedent’s position relative to the Right Frontier. Alternative theoretical approaches such as centering theory or situational models cannot account for the found results. The findings in the same gender antecedent condition are therefore interpreted as an effect of the Right Frontier Constraint.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, A., Garrod, S.C., Sanford, A.J.: The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35A, 427–440 (1983)
Ariel, M.: Accessibility theory: An overview. In: Sanders, T., Schilperoord, J., Spooren, W. (eds.) Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, pp. 29–87. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2001)
Asher, N.: Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)
Asher, N.: Discourse topic. Theoretical Linguistics 30, 163–201 (2004)
Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Asher, N., Vieu, L.: Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua 115, 591–610 (2005)
Chambers, C.G., Smyth, R.: Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 593–608 (1998)
Garnham, A.: Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Psychology Press Ltd., Sussex (2001)
Gordon, P., Grosz, B., Gilliom, G.: Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science 3(17), 311–347 (1993)
Grosz, B., Sidner, C.: Attentions, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3), 175–204 (1986)
Grosz, B., Joshi, A., Weinstein, S.: Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21(2), 203–226 (1995)
Hudson-d’Zmura, S., Tanenhaus, M.: Assigning antecedents to ambiguous pronouns. The role of the center of attention as the default assignment. In: Walker, M., Joshi, A., Prince, E. (eds.) Centering Theory in discourse, pp. 199–226. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)
Klin, C.M., et al.: When anaphor resolution fails: Partial encoding of anaphoric inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 54, 131–143 (2006)
Mann, W., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3), 243–281 (1988)
Matthiessen, C., Thompson, S.A.: The structure of discourse and subordination. In: Thompson, S.A., Haiman, J. (eds.) Clause combining in discourse and grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1987)
Morrow, D.G., Greenspan, S.L., Bower, G.H.: Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 165–187 (1987)
Polanyi, L.: A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 601–638 (1988)
Polanyi, L.: The linguistic structure of discourse. Technical Report CSLI-96-200. CSLI, Stanford University (1996)
Prince, E.F.: The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In: Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A. (eds.) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, pp. 295–326. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1992)
Sanders, T., Spooren, W., Noordman, L.: Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15, 1–35 (1992)
Webber, B.L.: Discourse deixis and discourse processing. Technical report MS-CIS-86-74. Linc Lab 42. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Holler, A., Irmen, L. (2007). Empirically Assessing Effects of the Right Frontier Constraint. In: Branco, A. (eds) Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications. DAARC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4410. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71412-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71412-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71411-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71412-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)