Skip to main content

Relevance Feedback Using Weight Propagation Compared with Information-Theoretic Query Expansion

  • Conference paper
  • 2060 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4425))

Abstract

A new Relevance Feedback (RF) technique called Weight Propagation has been developed which provides greater retrieval effectiveness and computational efficiency than previously described techniques. Documents judged relevant by the user propagate positive weights to documents close by in vector similarity space, while documents judged not relevant propagate negative weights to such neighbouring documents. Retrieval effectiveness is improved since the documents are treated as independent vectors rather than being merged into a single vector as is the case with traditional vector model RF techniques, or by determining the documents relevancy based in part on the lengths of all the documents as with traditional probabilistic RF techniques. Improving the computational efficiency of Relevance Feedback by considering only documents in a given neighbourhood means that the Weight Propagation technique can be used with large collections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw Hill, New York (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern information retrieval, p. 10. Addison-Wesley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou, X.S., Hunag, T.S.: Small sample learning during multimedia retrieval using bias map. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hawaii, Dec. 2001, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunlop, M.D.: The effect of accessing non-matching documents on relevance feedback. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 15(2), 137–153 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rocchio Jr., G.: Relevance feedback in information Retrieval. In: Salton, G. (ed.) The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ide, E.: New experiments in relevance feedback. In: Salton, G. (ed.) The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson, S.E., Sparck-Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 129-146 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information retrieval. Buttersworth, London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Beaulieu, M.M.: Okapi at TREC-7: automatic ad hoc, filtering, VLC and interactive track. In: Proceedings of the 7th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC7), Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Nist Special Publication 500-242, pp. 253–264 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 334–342. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Italian monolingual information retrieval with prosit. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J. (eds.) CLEF 2002. LNCS, vol. 2785, pp. 182–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Fub at Trec-10 web track: A probabilistic framework for topic relevance term weighting. In: Proceedings of the 10th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-10), NIST Special Publication 500-250, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, pp. 182–191 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Amati, G., van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring divergence from randomness. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 20(4), 357–389 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamout, F., Oakes, M., Tait, J.: Relevance feedback using weight propagation. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sander, P.V., Peleshchuk, D., Grosz, B.J.: A Scalable, Distributed Algorithm for Efficient Task Allocation. In: Alonso, E., Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D. (eds.) AAMAS 2000 and AAMAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2636, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chakrabarti, S., et al.: Mining the Link Structure of the World Wide Web. IEEE Computer (August 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kleinberg, J.M.: Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment. J. ACM 6(5), 604–632 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., Rahm, E.: Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In: The proceedings of the 18th ICDE Conference (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cortes, C., Pregibon, D., Volinsky, C.: Communities of interest. In: Hoffmann, F., et al. (eds.) IDA 2001. LNCS, vol. 2189, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamout, F., Moghrabi, I., Oakes, M.: Query and relevance feedback in latent semantic index with reduced time complexity. In: IASTED International Conference on Database Applications - DBA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harman, D.: Relevance feedback revisited. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in IR, pp. 1–10 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rose, D., Stevens, C.: V-twin: A lightweight engine for interactive use. In: NIST Special Publication 500-238: The 5th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5), pp. 279–290 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: A comparison of document clustering techniques. In: KDD Workshop on Text Mining (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ruthven, I., Lalmas, M.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge engineering review 18(2), 95–145 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Efthimiadis, N.E.: Query expansion. Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology 31, 121–187 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Croft, W.B., Harper, D.J.: Using probabilistic models of document retrieval without relevance information. Journal of Documentation 35(4), 285–295 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. CSIRO TREC Web Tracks homepage (2001), http://www.ted.cmis.csiro.au/TRECWeb/

  28. Yamout, F., et al.: Further Enhancement to the Porter’s Stemming Algorithm. In: TIR 2004, Germany (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Giambattista Amati Claudio Carpineto Giovanni Romano

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yamout, F., Oakes, M., Tait, J. (2007). Relevance Feedback Using Weight Propagation Compared with Information-Theoretic Query Expansion. In: Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4425. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71496-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71496-5_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71494-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71496-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics