Skip to main content

Validation of BDI Agents

  • Conference paper
Programming Multi-Agent Systems (ProMAS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4411))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Testing and Debugging multi-agent systems (MAS) – which are inherently concurrent and distributed – is a challenging task. While complex application scenarios demand intelligent entities with autonomous reasoning capabilities, the applied reasoning mechanisms impair current approaches to validate MAS implementations. Reactive planning systems, namely the well-known Belief Desire Intention (BDI) architecture, have been successfully applied to implement these intelligent entities by means of goal directed agents. Despite testing and debugging, used to validate whether implementations behave as intended, are crucial to serious development efforts, only minor attention has been payed to corresponding tool support and testing procedures for BDI–based MAS. In this paper, we examine how the reasoning mechanism inside agent implementations can be checked and how static analysis of agent declarations can be used to visualize and check the overall communication structure in closed MAS. We present corresponding tool support, which relies on the definition of crosscutting concerns in BDI agents and enables both approaches to the Jadex Agent Platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Odell, J.: Objects and agents compared. Journal of Object Technology 1 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, R.A.: Elephants don’t play chess. Robotics and Auton. Sys. 6, 3–15 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bratman, M.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-agents: from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First Intl. Conference on Multiagent Systems (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.L.: Reactive reasoning and planning: an experiment with a mobile robot. In: Proc. of AAAI 87, Seattle, Washington, pp. 677–682. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pokahr, A., Braubach, L., Lamersdorf, W.: A flexible BDI architecture supporting extensibility. In: The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conf. on IAT-2005, ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jennings, N.R.: Building complex, distributed systems: the case for an agent-based approach. Comms. of the ACM 44 (4), 35–41 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Liedekerke, M.H.V., Avouris, N.M.: Debugging multi-agent systems. Information and Software Technology Journal 37, 103–112 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ndumu, D.T., Nwana, H.S., Lee, L.C., Collis, J.C.: Visualising and debugging distributed multi-agent systems. Proc. of AGENTS ’99, 326–333 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flater, D.W.: Debugging agent interactions: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), pp. 107–114. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao, A.S.: Agentspeak(l): Bdi agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS, vol. 1038, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W., Moldt, D.: Goal representation for BDI agent systems. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Seghrouchni, A.E.F. (eds.) Programming Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3346, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pokahr, A., Braubach, L., Lamersdorf, W.: A bdi architecture for goal deliberation. In: Proc. of AAMAS ’05, pp. 1295–1296 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Busetta, P., Howden, N., Rönnquist, R., Hodgson, A.: Structuring BDI agents in functional clusters. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, pp. 277–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Menzies, T., Pecheur, C.: Verification and validation and artificial intelligence. In: Zelkowitz, M. (ed.) Advances in Computers, vol. 65, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Timm, I.J., Scholz, T.: From Testing to Theorem Proving (Part IV). In: Multiagent Engineering. Theory and Applications in Enterprises. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 531–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2006), doi:10.1007/3-540-32062-8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sudeikat, J., Renz, W.: Monitoring group behavior in goal–directed agents using co–efficient plan observation. In: Padgham, L., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) AOSE VII / AOSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4405, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Padgham, L., Winikoff, M., Poutakidis, D.: Adding debugging support to the prometheus methodology. Engin. Applications of Art. Intel. 18, 173–190 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chesani, F.: Formalization and verification of interaction protocols. In: Gabbrielli, M., Gupta, G. (eds.) ICLP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3668, pp. 437–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Botía, J.A., López-Acosta, A., Gómez-Skarmeta, A.F.: ACLAnalyser: A tool for debugging multi-agent systems. In: ECAI, pp. 967–968 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lam, D.N., Barber, K.S.: Automated interpretation of agent behavior. In: Workshop for Agent-Oriented Information Systems (AOIS-2005) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lam, D.N., Barber, K.S.: Comprehending agent software. In: Proc. of the 4th int. joint conf. on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS ’05) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Low, C.K., Chen, T.Y., Rönnquist, R.: Automated test case generation for bdi agents. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 311–332 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poutakidis, D., Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: Debugging multi-agent systems using design artifacts: the case of interaction protocols. In: Alonso, E., Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D. (eds.) Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2636, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poutakidis, D., Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: An exploration of bugs and debugging in multi-agent systems. In: Zhong, N., Raś, Z.W., Tsumoto, S., Suzuki, E. (eds.) ISMIS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2871, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoare, C.A.R.: Assertions: a personal perspective. Software pioneers: contributions to software engineering, 356–366 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Floyd, R.: Assigning meaning to programs. In: Mathematical Aspects of Computer Science, XIX American Mathematical Society, pp. 19–32 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Turing, A.M.: Checking a large routine. In: Report on a Conference on High Speed Automatic Calculating Machines, Cambridge University Mathematical Lab. (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer, B.: Object Oriented Software Construction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Voas, J.: How assertions can increase test effectiveness. IEEE Software, 118–122 (March/April 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Busetta, P., Rönnquist, R., Hodgson, A., Lucas, A.: Jack - intelligent agents – components for intelligent agents in java. Technical report, Agent Oriented Software Pty. Ltd. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pokahr, A., Braubach, L., Lamersdorf, W.: Jadex: A bdi reasoning engine. In: Multi-Agent Programming. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations, vol. 15, pp. 149–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2005), doi:10.1007/b137449

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferber, J.: Multi-Agent Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W.: Jadex: A BDI Agent System Combining Middleware and Reasoning. In: Software Agent-Based Applications, Platforms and Development Kits, Birkhäuser, Basel (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM 15, 1053–1058 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Menhdhekar, A., Maeda, C., Lopes, C., Loingtier, J.M., Irwin, J.: Aspect-oriented programming. In: Aksit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W.: Extending the capability concept for flexible BDI agent modularization. In: Proc. of PROMAS-2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rafael H. Bordini Mehdi Dastani Jürgen Dix Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sudeikat, J., Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W., Renz, W. (2007). Validation of BDI Agents. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Seghrouchni, A.E.F. (eds) Programming Multi-Agent Systems. ProMAS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4411. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71956-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71956-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71955-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71956-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics