Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die zwei Kulturen

  • Chapter
Social Semantic Web

Part of the book series: X.media.press ((XMEDIAP))

  • 3665 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Oft werden zwei mögliche Entwicklungen des Webs diskutiert – das Web 2.0 und das Semantic Web. Wenn wir diese zwei Visionen für das zukünftige Web unter die Lupe nehmen, dann lässt sich feststellen, dass sich die Ideen in ihrem Kern und ihren Technologien gegenseitig ergänzen. Dementsprechend können und sollen beide Visionen von den Erfahrungen und Stärken der anderen profitieren. Wir glauben daran, dass zukünftige Webanwendungen den Web 2.0-Fokus auf Community und Benutzerfreundlichkeit beibehalten und, darüber hinaus, auch von Technologien des Semantic Web zur Vereinfachung der mashupähnlichen Datenintegration profitieren werden. Auf Basis eines Semantic Blog-Szenarios werden wir hier die Vorteile einer möglichen Kombination von Semantic Web und Web 2.0 illustrieren, die zeitnah realisiert werden kann. Wir werden auch auf technische Probleme eingehen, die bei der Erweiterung dieses Szenarios entstehen. Wir stellen dar, wie aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Semantic Web Forschung diese Probleme angehen können, und setzen zugleich auch Schwerpunkte für die zukünftige Forschung, die in diesem Zusammenhang relevant sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ankolekar, A., Vrandecic, D.: Personalizing Web surfing with semantically enriched peronal profiles. In: M. Bouzid, N. Henze (eds.) Proc. Semantic Web Personalization Workshop. Budva, Montenegro (2006). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/dvr/publications/swp2006.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arenas, M., Perez, J.A., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. In: I. Cruz, S. Decker (eds.) Proc. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC06), pp. 30–43. Athens, GA, USA (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the EL envelope. In: Proc. 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’05). Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, Edinburgh, UK (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beged-Dov, G., Brickley, D., Dornfest, R., Davis, I., Dodds, L., Eisenzopf, J., Galbraith, D., Guha, R., MacLeod, K., Miller, E., Swartz, A., van der Vlist, E.: RDF Site Summary 1.0 (9 December 2000). Available at http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/spec.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 5 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein, A., Kaufmann, E., Göhring, A., Kiefer, C.: Querying ontologies: A controlled english interface for end-users. In: Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC05), pp. 112–126 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bizer, C., Seaborne, A.: D2RQ – treating non-RDF databases as virtual RDF graphs. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04) (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braun, S., Schmidt, A., Zacharias, V.: Ontology maturing with lightweight collaborative ontology editing tools. In: Proc. Workshop on Productive Knowledge Work: Management and Technological Challenges (ProKW) (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M.: Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 (second edition). W3C Recommendation REC-xml-20001006, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2000). Available at http://www.w3.org/XML/.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Breslin, J.G., Harth, A., Bojârs, U., Decker, S.: Towards semantically-interlinked online communities. In: Proc. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC05), Heraklion, Greece, Proceedings, LNCS 3532, pp. 500–514 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation (10 February 2004). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brickley, D., Miller, L.: FOAF vocabulary specification, revision (2003). Available at http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cali, A., Kifer, M.: Containment of conjunctive object meta-queries. In: Proc. 32nd Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB06), pp. 942–952. VLDB Endowment (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cayzer, S.: Semantic blogging and decentralized knowledge management. Communications of the ACM 47(12), 47–52 (2004). URL http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-223.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cayzer, S.: What next for semantic blogging? Tech. Rep. HPL-2006-149, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK (2006). URL http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2006/HPL-2006-149.html.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Creative Commons: „Some Rights Reserved“: Building a layer of reasonable copyright. http://creativecommons.org

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson, F., Howes, T.: vcard mime directory profile. RFC 2426, Internet Engineering Task Force (1998). URL ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2426.txt

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dawson, F., Stenerson, D.: Internet calendaring and scheduling core object specification (icalendar). RFC 2445, Internet Engineering Task Force (1998). URL ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2445.txt.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ding, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Pan, R., Cost, R.S., Peng, Y., Reddivari, P., Doshi, V., Sachs, J.: Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the Semantic Web. In: Proc. 13th ACM Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 58–61 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  21. (ed.), B.C.G.: OWL 1.1 web ontology language (November 2006). Available at http://owl1 1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/

    Google Scholar 

  22. (ed.), T.C.: hReview 0.3 (22 February 2006). Available at http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM – Quick ontology mapping. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04), pp. 683–697. Springer (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology mapping – an integrated approach. In: Proc. 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, vol. 3053, pp. 76–91. Springer (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Friedland, N., Allen, P., Matthews, G., Witbrock, M., Baxter, D., Curtis, J., Shepard, B., Miraglia, P., Angele, J., Staab, S., Mönch, E., Oppermann, H., Wenke, D., Porter, B., Barker, K., Fan, J., Chaw, S.Y., Yeh, P., Tecuci, D., Clark, P.: Project Halo: Towards a digital Aristotle. AI Magazine (2004). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/sst/Research/Publications/2004/ai-mag- preprint04.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: FilmTrust: movie recommendations using trust in web-based social networks. In: Proc. IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heath, T., Motta, E.: Reviews and ratings on the semantic web. In: Poster Track, 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2006). Athens, Georgia, USA (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heflin, J., Pan, J.Z.: A model theoretic semantics for ontology versioning. In: Third International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 62–76. Springer, Hiroshima, Japan (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Reducing SH IQ- description logic to disjunctive datalog programs. In: Proc. of KR2004, pp. 152–162. AAAI Press (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Hendler, J.: Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies. Journal of Web Semantics 3 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Karger, D.R., Quan, D.: What would it mean to blog on the semantic web? In: S.A. McIlraith, D. Plexousakis, F. van Harmelen (eds.) Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04), Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 214–228. Springer (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R.W., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The Protege OWL plugin: An open development environment for SemanticWeb applications. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC04. Springer (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lam, J., Pan, J.Z., Sleeman, D., Vasconcelos, W.: A fine-grained approach to resolving unsatisfiable ontologies. In: Proc. of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI-2006) (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lassila, O.: Identity crisis and serendipity (May 2006). Available at http://www.lassila.org/publications/2006/IdentityCrisisAndSerendipity.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L.: Managing multiple and distributed ontologies in the Semantic Web. VLDB Journal 12(4), 286–302 (2003). URL http://www.fzi.de/KCMS/kcms file.php?action=link&id=158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manola, F., Miller, E.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) primer. W3C Recommendation (10 February 2004). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D.. Davis, M.: HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proc. 17th Conf. on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HYPERTEXT’06), pp. 31–40 (2006). URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mika, P.: Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In: Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC05), pp. 522–536 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Integrating description logics and relational databases (Dec 6, 2006). Technical Report, University of Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nottingham, M., Sayre, R.: The atom syndication format. RFC 4287, Internet Engineering Task Force (2005). URL ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc4287.txt.

    Google Scholar 

  41. O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0 – design patterns and business models for the next generation of software (2005). Available at http://www.oreillynet.com/ pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Oren, E., Delbru, R., Decker, S.: Extending faceted navigation for rdf data. In: I. Cruz, S. Decker (eds.) Proc. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC06), pp. 559–572 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pan, R., Ding, Z., Yu, Y., Peng, Y.: A Bayesian network approach to ontology mapping. In: Proc. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC05) (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Seaborne, A., Prud’hommeaux, E.: SPARQL query language for RDF. Tech. Rep. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-rdf-sparql-query-20060406/, W3C (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.: Web ontology segmentation: Analysis, classification and use. In: Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web (WWW 2006), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 23–26 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004). W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R.: On-to-knowledge methodology. In: S. Staab, R.S. (eds.) (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, Series on Handbooks in Information Systems, chap. 6, pp. 117–132. Springer (2003). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/publications/ 2003ontohandbookot kmethodology.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tempich, C., Pinto, H.S., Sure, Y., Staab, S.: An argumentation ontology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering processes of ontologies (DILIGENT). In: Proc. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC05), LNCS 3532, pp. 241–256. Springer (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vrandecic, D., Krötzsch, M.: Reusing ontological background knowledge in semantic wikis. In: Proceedings of 1st Workshop „From Wiki to Semantics“ (SemWiki’06) (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vrandecic, D., Pinto, H.S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C.: The DILIGENT knowledge processes. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(5), 85–96 (2005). URL http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/publications/2005_kmjournal_ diligent.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wolstencroft, K., Lord, P., Tabernero, L., Brass, A., Stevens, R.: Using ontology reasoning to classify protein phosphatases. 8th Annual Bio-Ontologies Meeting 2005 24 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zacharias, V., Sibler, M.: Semantic announcement sharing. In: Proc. Fachgruppentreffen Wissensmanagement (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    Anupriya Ankolekar, Markus Krötzsch, Than Tran & Denny Vrandecic

Authors
  1. Anupriya Ankolekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Krötzsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Than Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Denny Vrandecic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Semantic Web School, Lerchenfelder Gürtel 43, 1160, Wien, Österreich

    Andreas Blumauer  & Tassilo Pellegrini  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ankolekar, A., Krötzsch, M., Tran, T., Vrandecic, D. (2009). Die zwei Kulturen. In: Blumauer, A., Pellegrini, T. (eds) Social Semantic Web. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72216-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation